Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://cathode.church/users/mu/statuses/110430068590508467">Tobias (mu@cathode.church)'s status on Sunday, 04-Jun-2023 15:06:43 JST</a><a href="https://cathode.church/@mu" title="mu@cathode.church"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/134035-48-20230604055730.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Tobias" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Tobias</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke/110430008896612430" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/109948" title="yatil@yatil.social">Eric Eggert</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke">@patrick_h_lauke</a> <a href="https://yatil.social/@yatil">@yatil</a> <a href="https://tilde.zone/@daveshea">@daveshea</a> </p><p>I find this article especially relevant. Even if someone personally believes that stramps in general are accessible, B.C. government considers this particular stramp to be ornamental because it fails accessibility audits, which makes it a questionable choice as a "good universal design" example to say the least.</p><p>Edit because I originally failed to include to article.<br><a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/robson-square-province-reax-1.5265090" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/robson-square-province-reax-1.5265090</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1619279#notice-3189191">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-06-04T15:06:43+09:00" title="Sunday, 04-Jun-2023 15:06:43 JST">Sunday, 04-Jun-2023 15:06:43 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://cathode.church/@mu/110430068590508467" rel="external" title="Sent from cathode.church via ActivityPub">cathode.church</a></span></span><a href="https://cathode.church/@mu/110430068590508467">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.cbc.ca</div><h5><a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/robson-square-province-reax-1.5265090">Province won't change Robson Square steps despite accessibility complaints | CBC News</a></h5><div></div></header><div>The ramp that zigzags across the steps at Robson Square in downtown Vancouver will not be modified to address accessibility concerns because of the “architectural significance of the site.”</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Tobias (mu@cathode.church)'s status on Sunday, 04-Jun-2023 15:06:43 JSTTobias
in reply to
- Patrick H. Lauke
- Eric Eggert
@patrick_h_lauke @yatil @daveshea
I find this article especially relevant. Even if someone personally believes that stramps in general are accessible, B.C. government considers this particular stramp to be ornamental because it fails accessibility audits, which makes it a questionable choice as a "good universal design" example to say the least.
Edit because I originally failed to include to article.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/robson-square-province-reax-1.5265090
In conversationSunday, 04-Jun-2023 15:06:43 JST from cathode.churchpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.cbc.ca
  Province won't change Robson Square steps despite accessibility complaints | CBC News
  The ramp that zigzags across the steps at Robson Square in downtown Vancouver will not be modified to address accessibility concerns because of the “architectural significance of the site.”

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice