Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://hachyderm.io/users/stephen0x2dfox/statuses/110352745670011758">stephen-fox (stephen0x2dfox@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 12-May-2023 23:17:29 JST</a><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@stephen0x2dfox" title="stephen0x2dfox@hachyderm.io"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/118330-48-20230512141729.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="stephen-fox" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">stephen-fox</a><div><a href="https://bikeshed.party/objects/18954881-154f-44ab-a65a-f487a638e2c9" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/118179" title="emaste@mastodon.social">Ed Maste</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://bikeshed.party/users/feld">@feld</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@emaste">@emaste</a> Thanks for sharing. That blog post was a great read. I wonder if the OpenBSD ntpd could be included in the FreeBSD install if the existing daemon is in such bad shape.</p><p>The CCC presentation linked in that post is a worthwhile watch too (<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRg2vuwF1hY" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRg2vuwF1hY</a>). A third-party audit of (say) the TCP/IP stack would be really interesting.</p><p>It looks like there is already some automated kernel fuzzing in place which is really great to see.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1453023#notice-2963969">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-05-12T23:17:29+09:00" title="Friday, 12-May-2023 23:17:29 JST">Friday, 12-May-2023 23:17:29 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@stephen0x2dfox/110352745670011758" rel="external" title="Sent from hachyderm.io via ActivityPub">hachyderm.io</a></span></span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@stephen0x2dfox/110352745670011758">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><img height="128" width="128" src="https://gnusocial.jp/thumbnail/924855?w=128&amp;h=128"><h5><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRg2vuwF1hY">34C3 - Are all BSDs created equally?</a></h5><div> from <span>media.ccc.de</span></div></header><div>https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-8968-are_all_bsds_created_equallyA survey of BSD kernel vulnerabilities.In this presentation I start off asking the question „How...</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.interesting.it</div><h5><a href="https://www.interesting.it/">Origine dei Modi di Dire</a></h5><div></div></header><div>INTERESTING .IT: Alcune curiosità dal mondo, record interessanti e allo stesso tempo bizzarri e l'origine di alcuni modi di dire.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
stephen-fox (stephen0x2dfox@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 12-May-2023 23:17:29 JSTstephen-fox
in reply to
- feld
- Ed Maste
@feld @emaste Thanks for sharing. That blog post was a great read. I wonder if the OpenBSD ntpd could be included in the FreeBSD install if the existing daemon is in such bad shape.
The CCC presentation linked in that post is a worthwhile watch too (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRg2vuwF1hY). A third-party audit of (say) the TCP/IP stack would be really interesting.
It looks like there is already some automated kernel fuzzing in place which is really great to see.
In conversation2 years ago from hachyderm.iopermalink
Attachments
1. 34C3 - Are all BSDs created equally?
  from media.ccc.de
  https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-8968-are_all_bsds_created_equallyA survey of BSD kernel vulnerabilities.In this presentation I start off asking the question „How...
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.interesting.it
  Origine dei Modi di Dire
  INTERESTING .IT: Alcune curiosità dal mondo, record interessanti e allo stesso tempo bizzarri e l'origine di alcuni modi di dire.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice