@leftout @Erik > They get richer off of other people’s labour.

Not because someone else did just anything. Because the other labour fits with a bigger plan there is value in another's labour. That bigger plan is called an enterprise. And if you tie up many workes into an enterprise to produce more than nothing, it's not the individual's labour in which there is value. Like if you're just selling what another produces and give them nothing for it, that obviously sucks, and /is/ stealing, as opposed to an enterprise I'm trying to explain. The collective collaboration, clicking into itself and making it more efficient than any singular worker could possibly accomplish, has value not attributable to any individual worker, and who should earn that? The ones who are executing or the ones who are coordinating? Does coordinating labour to produce more than an individual could possibly do have value in itself or should it have no benefit to those coordinating?