@drq @aurynn Committee sounds pretty formal to me. Pleroma never had that. What pleroma missed in the last couple of years imo was scrutiny of code quality (luckily this has been changing since february). For direction, pleroma does want to be flexible, so yeah, that kinda invites that it can go in all sorts of ways. But that's not because of a committee, afaict that was basically lain's vision from the start.