@ryo @udon I tried to be an ideologue when I was a teenager because it's easy. So, I looked for ideologies, but I didn't agree with any of them, so it didn't work. And then I eventually realized that they are stupid, and later that they are evil.

The fact that they are stupid is a lot more obvious considering that every ideologue says that those other people are "not real whateverists". Also "I am a whateverist, but I don't believe in these whateverist points". Or someone doesn't know what the fuck the ideology is and they have to explain it, and it takes longer than just explaining what the fuck they believe in directly, negating the point of the word. Really, everything about ideologues contradicts the convenience that supposedly comes from using those terms. I think it pretty clearly makes dialogue worse, not better.

And of course, all of them argue incessantly about what the ideology is. The hell is the point? It just prevents growth and creates a group mentality and divides people into irrational camps of screeching monkeys, that's all it does. People that I talk to still know my points, they don't need me to be a whateverist. And if you don't make points, people are never going to know you anyway, there is no way to avoid. Well, unless you become a completely generic person that is a perfect embodiment of those labels. Then maybe someone could know everything about you just from you writing "trans xim/xhem, atheist, anarcho-nationalist-social-democratic-communist-monarchist, furry, gamer" on a Twitter profile (I hear that that's what they do).