Embed Notice

@jonny@neuromatch.social it should have been one of the most obvious and salient points, and yet people still argued that he was "doing active harm" (despite zero evidence of any actual code deletions even happening) and "breaking trust" and... the whole thing makes me want to scream with rage. Those "points" were so ridiculous (they boiled down to, basically, the notion of direct action or speaking up should be ILLEGAL) I just... how do you even respond to that?