@judgedread

> Is anything reliable?

Well, I think when he says "unreliable" he's saying that you can't avoid second-guessing it. Confidently spouting horseshit at you is a thing that you expect a machine to do but you also expect to be able to rely on secondary signals like "it's complete gibberish" instead of "this is syntactically correct but is bullshit". And we've hooked it up to automation systems, right, and short of something like Kimi-K2, I barely see these things able to make sense of their surroundings. So I think that represents, more or less, the aspirational goal of LLMs as such. Absent an architectural shift, that'll be as good as it gets.
notepadchan.png