Embed Notice

@aeva I have actual concerns that there could be a threshold (we haven't hit it) at which these systems could cross a duty of care. You hear AI bros brag about this all the time, that we're "so close to AGI", and "AIs are nearly people now", so give us more money

Oh yeah? And what are you going to do in your AGI moment, where AIs are people and have a duty of care. You're going to tell your investors sorry, we need to stop using these tools immediately and protect them so we don't commit atrocities, right?

Ha.

HA.

It should be obvious to everyone that, whether you think they can hit it or not, the end goal for AI corporations is digital slavery. The closer we can get to it, indeed, if we *can* achieve something that has ethical problems to abuse, then the better.