Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/yoasif/statuses/116263603404232429">yoasif (yoasif@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Mar-2026 06:29:13 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@yoasif" title="yoasif@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/149457-48-20230714164125.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="yoasif" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">yoasif</a><div><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@dalias/116263584723500593" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/383738" title="quarknova@wikis.world">chaotic enby</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@dalias">@dalias</a> <a href="https://wikis.world/@quarknova">@quarknova</a> I mean, forks could exist. </p><p>Forks wouldn't have a deal for big tech to opt out of share-alike, so we could conceivably see better stewards for this repository of knowledge than the Jimmy Wales crew. </p><p>As it is, contributing directly to Wikipedia constitutes a tacit acknowledgement of a rejection of the license that your contributions are nominally contributed under; Wikipedia has opted you out, even if you haven't. </p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0omu7x_LbU" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0omu7x_LbU</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/6252976#notice-12324285">In conversation</a><time datetime="2026-03-21T06:29:13+09:00" title="Saturday, 21-Mar-2026 06:29:13 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@yoasif/116263603404232429" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@yoasif/116263603404232429">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><img height="128" width="128" src="https://gnusocial.jp/thumbnail/5912457?w=128&amp;h=128"><h5><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0omu7x_LbU">The game is rigged, but you cannot lose if you do not play.</a></h5><div> from <span>- M</span></div></header><div>Marla Daniels explains to her husband Cedric the problems with "playing the game" from "The Detail" Season 1, Episode 2 of The Wire.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
yoasif (yoasif@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Mar-2026 06:29:13 JSTyoasif
in reply to
- Rich Felker
- chaotic enby
@dalias @quarknova I mean, forks could exist.
Forks wouldn't have a deal for big tech to opt out of share-alike, so we could conceivably see better stewards for this repository of knowledge than the Jimmy Wales crew.
As it is, contributing directly to Wikipedia constitutes a tacit acknowledgement of a rejection of the license that your contributions are nominally contributed under; Wikipedia has opted you out, even if you haven't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0omu7x_LbU
In conversationabout 4 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. The game is rigged, but you cannot lose if you do not play.
  from - M
  Marla Daniels explains to her husband Cedric the problems with "playing the game" from "The Detail" Season 1, Episode 2 of The Wire.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice