@deprecated_ii Nobody in that thread tried to explain evolution in a systematic (or axiomatic way) which is how you know that they're just repeating words without thinking through the scientific theory they claim to believe (you can't even believe in a conditional theory stupid idiot)

Evolution defined as "differential survival of those with advantageous traits" is a tautology and uninteresting. But if you tie that tautology to a method of making those traits hereditary and mutable then you have something that will solve for local extrema (this is how programmers can write "evolutionary algorithms". If you can code something then it obviously has some axiomatic structure to it)

The real kicker is 1) where did this process start and how? And 2) how exactly do the random probabilities work out to produce such complex biological structures let alone behaviors. All discussions with evolutionists never get to the problems posed by 1) and 2) because they don't actually like or understand science, they're just conformist tattle tales