Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/foolishowl/statuses/114859864818664652">FoolishOwl (foolishowl@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jul-2025 08:36:50 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@foolishowl" title="foolishowl@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/93402-48-20230131165854.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="FoolishOwl" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">FoolishOwl</a><div><a href="https://gamedev.lgbt/@typeswitch/114859833042436458" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://gamedev.lgbt/@typeswitch">@typeswitch</a> This reminds me of Murray Bookchin's idea that usufruct should be primary: that property should belong to the person who uses it and only insofar as they are using it.</p><p>As I understand it, that's in contrast with the concept we inherited from ancient Roman law.</p><p><a href="https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/murray-bookchin-janet-biehl-the-murray-bookchin-reader#toc18" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/murray-bookchin-janet-biehl-the-murray-bookchin-reader#toc18</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5358410#notice-10512131">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-07-16T08:36:50+09:00" title="Wednesday, 16-Jul-2025 08:36:50 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.coop/@foolishowl/114859864818664652" rel="external" title="Sent from social.coop via ActivityPub">social.coop</a></span></span><a href="https://social.coop/@foolishowl/114859864818664652">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/351825">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
FoolishOwl (foolishowl@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 16-Jul-2025 08:36:50 JSTFoolishOwl
in reply to
- Azul
@typeswitch This reminds me of Murray Bookchin's idea that usufruct should be primary: that property should belong to the person who uses it and only insofar as they are using it.
As I understand it, that's in contrast with the concept we inherited from ancient Roman law.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/murray-bookchin-janet-biehl-the-murray-bookchin-reader#toc18
In conversationabout 2 months ago from social.cooppermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice