Alexey, I find the argument you presented analogous to shooting the messenger. telling a victim to shut up because their speaking up brings harm onto the aggressor is unjust. if denouncing an injustice is labeled as terrorism, but the injustice itself isn't called out, something's fishy. if some action would be perceived negatively, IMHO the best course of action is not to suppress the speech that calls it out so that the presumed negative action can remain unchallenged and unknown, but to get the negative action to stop