Caveat. It's a preprint.
Not peer reviewed yet.
I'm not rejecting it outright like many AI papers for flawed methodology.
Intuitively I'm sceptical of the brainwave analysis. I have to read the full paper how it was measured.
One interpretation might be that the LLM users were chill about what they were doing having confidence in their tool.
THINK HARDER seems like a hard deal to sell.
Human civilization is driven by less effort, not more.