Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Thorwegian ❄️ (thor@berserker.town)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 10:17:24 JST Thorwegian ❄️

   ?

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 10:17:21 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @thor >will make a movie look like a soap opera
     60fps (or 120fps) is excellent compared to the juddery mess of 24fps, so bring on the soap opera.
     
     People are put off by a reasonable smooth video so they turn it off pretty much.
     
     The first interpolation implementations were terrible because they were an artifacts fest, but recent implementations now barely ever artifact, so you always want it on for video.
   • Embed this notice
     Thorwegian ❄️ (thor@berserker.town)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 10:17:22 JST Thorwegian ❄️

     in reply to

     • Katherine Faraday, esnoam princess

     @KayFaraday it's the one that will make a movie look like a soap opera

   • Embed this notice
     Katherine Faraday, esnoam princess (kayfaraday@freak.university)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 10:17:23 JST Katherine Faraday, esnoam princess

     in reply to

     @thor what is this feature?

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 10:20:24 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Katherine Faraday, esnoam princess
     @thor @KayFaraday >will make a movie look like a soap opera
     60fps (or 120fps) is decent compared to the juddery mess of 24fps, so bring on the soap opera (which were commonly recorded in 60fps).
     
     24fps was selected only because that was the lowest possible framerate that looks like motion (without causing eyestrain etc in most people), to save on film.
     
     
     People are put off by a reasonably smooth video so they turn it off pretty much.
     
     The first interpolation implementations were terrible because they were an artifacts fest, but recent implementations now barely ever artifact, so you always want it on for video.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 11:07:28 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @thor >in a movie projector, they'd flash the shutter 3 times per frame, so like a 72 Hz CRT
     Except it was still 24fps, not 72fps.
     
     >by strobing it, that blur is reduced.
     Sure, but less blur doesn't fix the problem of a ridiculously low framerate.
   • Embed this notice
     Thorwegian ❄️ (thor@berserker.town)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Dec-2022 11:07:30 JST Thorwegian ❄️

     in reply to

     • 翠星石
     • Katherine Faraday, esnoam princess

     @Suiseiseki @KayFaraday much of that jitter is a side effect of the fact that LCD pixels never turn off. in a movie projector, they'd flash the shutter 3 times per frame, so like a 72 Hz CRT. the jitter is caused by the eye saccades being out of step with the motion so there's a kind of blur from it. but by strobing it, that blur is reduced.