After observing how ZFS stripes data by default I am revoking my previous hype for running ZFS on Linux.
This is a terrible idea. ZFS should only be ran on FreeBSD. No notes.
After observing how ZFS stripes data by default I am revoking my previous hype for running ZFS on Linux.
This is a terrible idea. ZFS should only be ran on FreeBSD. No notes.
@nova more info / link please
@nova interesting topic, I will like to know more.
@nova I believe ZFS was first implemented on FreeBSD long before Linux as the first non-SunOS system and has had many years to be tweaked. Also, while FreeBSD moves slower, I always felt the entire system was developed way more purposely than the ‘throw it at the wall and see what sticks’ approach that Linux distros felt like for years. Trying to install RedHat 5.2 vs FreeBSD when I was in college was a night and day difference. :freebsd_logo:
@nova ZFS is fantastic but still needs to mature further before it becomes a mainstream default FS.
I enjoyed working with it on Solaris 10 and 11. With planning it made life a little easier in the systems I was managing for a customer, particularly when expanding storage.
@nova or Illumos. Same is true for NFS, which is still pathologically slow and stupid on Linux.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.