Mastodon, holy shit. You can’t quote-tweet (quote-mast?) AND there’s no dedicated column for mentions so I have to click individual posts and scroll to see replies?
Those are some serious barriers to using this site.
Mastodon, holy shit. You can’t quote-tweet (quote-mast?) AND there’s no dedicated column for mentions so I have to click individual posts and scroll to see replies?
Those are some serious barriers to using this site.
@catvalente @vitruvianmeeple It'd be easy to fix by injecting some JS via a browser extension, for the web anyway, or building into one of the multiple alternative frontends.
I agree it's annoying, and just a question of time before support for it becomes a thing.
After all just pasting the url to a tweet was the old-school Twitter way too...
@vitruvianmeeple it also provides context, though. Especially with threads, that’s vital.
@catvalente The lack of quote-tweeting was a conscious choice. QTing on Twitter lends itself to the quoter interacting with THEIR audience, rather than the person who originally posted it. It's often used as a way to "reply" to a post in a negative manner without making that as obvious to the OP, or to later "I didn't mean anything, I was just saying..." type justifications.
By replying publicly, you're still drawing the post to your readers' attention while interacting with the OP.
@mastodonmigration @catvalente @vitruvianmeeple
I've been here on other accounts long enough to know that to me this is broken. It's a bit insulting to get told I don't know what is broken to me.
No. I don't like the lack of QT's.
@vidar @catvalente @vitruvianmeeple Hello Vidar, welcome. You've just landed. You must be able to see how this post comes across to the citizens of this planet? Before you try to fix what is not broken, why not settle in and start to interact with the community here. You may find that you like it, and it will certainly inform your opinions.
@pawlicker @vitruvianmeeple @catvalente @mastodonmigration
Thanks, that's useful. I'll have a look and see if it fits my use. Even if it dosn't, "borrowing" the QT support might be a nice shortcut.
@pawlicker@pawlicker.ddns.net Fediverse instances should never be that large. It should be taxing and extremely expensive to run single instances that large. That's the entire point of the fediverse---decentealized hosting, decentralized instances, decentralized control.
@vidar@m.galaxybound.com @vitruvianmeeple@dice.camp @catvalente@mastodon.world @mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
@kino @pawlicker @mastodonmigration @catvalente @vitruvianmeeple The irony is that the advise in that gist *does* make it far more expensive than it needs to be (e.g. he only needs to recommend proxy requests to the object storage because they're mentioning S3, which is extremely expensive, in the first place)
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.