Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:10:00 JST josh
   I hate whores. It started with their rampant DMCA abuse, then how they retroactively claim their commercial products are 'revenge porn', the unearned leverage they have over search engines to censor results just because their commercial work happens to include their nudity.
   
   But now I see they're a really, really bad influence on women in general. A woman knows a """sex worker""" and she tells them how violent her johns are, how they'd pay her extra to let them slap her around, and she passes this tidbit off to her friends who then think men are sexually violent rapists and they just hold this as a universal truth. When, obviously, the reality is simply that a whore's clients are going to be either mentally or physically mangled, because who else pays for sex?
   
   And then to complicate things further, women tend to be naturally against pornography, but then many of those same women are pro-"sex work"! Only because society has said that is a valid career, and that women are empowered by it. When really, they should look at "sex workers" - both common whores and digital prostitutes - as a mockery of what a woman is, the same way you look at a tranny as just an adulteration of a man.
   
   Very frustrating. You just want to shake people until all the loose parts fall out. People can be so close to just accepting cold reality, but stubbornly cling to what they were taught and just accepted as true, in the name of "being polite".
   
   It's really time to stop being polite, stop giving a fuck about the welfare of lower lifeforms, and start looking out for yourselves first. If smart people allowed themselves to be more selfish, we'd all be better off. Instead, the smartest people in society are trained to obsess over the comfort of the most useless cunts alive.
   • twl likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:17:29 JST josh

     in reply to

     • Herman_Hetherington
     @Herman_Hetherington Eran Shor
     Israeli-Canadian sociologist
   • Embed this notice
     Herman_Hetherington (herman_hetherington@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:17:32 JST Herman_Hetherington

     in reply to
     @josh I don't think it's generally the women against porn who are pro sex work. Also research has shown women are more turned on by violent pornography than men.
     link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-021-02053-1
   • Embed this notice
     josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:28:44 JST josh

     in reply to

     • Herman_Hetherington
     @Herman_Hetherington >female undergraduates (N = 355) using a fantasy checklist that reflected the legal definition of rape
     
     Small sample size, but this abstraction explains the caveat. This is how they work. The legal definition of rape means anything not explicitly consensual. So an attractive man they already like doing something assertive (like grabbing arms, pulling in, and going for a risky and passionate first kiss) is rape by this study.
     
     Then they repackage it as "60% of female students want to be raped" and you have incels repeating that most women openly admit to wanting to be grabbed and sodomized behind an Arby's dumpster.
     
     They have literally turned man and woman against each other with these bullshit ((((((((sociology))))))) studies.
   • Embed this notice
     Herman_Hetherington (herman_hetherington@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:28:45 JST Herman_Hetherington

     in reply to
     @josh OK 62% of women have had rape fantasies. Is an Italian surname good enough for you? I couldn't find anyone White.
     tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490802624406#:~:text=Results%20indicated%20that%2062%25%20of,at%20least%20once%20a%20week.
   • Embed this notice
     josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:53:13 JST josh

     in reply to

     • Herman_Hetherington
     @Herman_Hetherington N=86 is INSANE dude. This is 63% of 62% of a group of college aged women from the North Texas University self-reported this. I am telling you, Sociology is a Talmudic meme.
     
     What does the word fantasy mean in this study? In your head, you assume that these women are masturbating to completion while thinking about being hardcore raped by a stranger, but chances are that is not what is being recorded as a fantasy, and it is most definitely not violent pornography.
     
     If you're going to choose to believe otherwise it's on you.
   • Embed this notice
     Herman_Hetherington (herman_hetherington@poa.st)'s status on Monday, 28-Nov-2022 17:53:14 JST Herman_Hetherington

     in reply to
     @josh You can read the logs in the study. 63% of 86 recorded rape fantasies include non consensual vaginal sex and 11% included non consensual anal sex.
   • Embed this notice
     josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Nov-2022 01:19:30 JST josh

     in reply to

     • Meticore
     @meticore >some women masturbate with sex toys and want to vote, therefore being aroused by physical abuse and rape is cool
     what other point am I to extrapolate from this retard shit you wrote
   • Embed this notice
     Meticore (meticore@sneed.social)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Nov-2022 01:19:32 JST Meticore

     in reply to
     Dude the offtopic section of your subforum for women has a sextoy general, feminism, lesbian general and other degeneracy.
   • Embed this notice
     Meticore (meticore@sneed.social)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Nov-2022 01:28:40 JST Meticore

     in reply to
     It's funny seeing you cry about whores when your own turf is filled with degenerate women, that is all.
   • Embed this notice
     josh (josh@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Nov-2022 01:28:40 JST josh

     in reply to

     • Meticore
     @meticore Complete non sequitur, low IQ dribble.
   • Embed this notice
     HowDoILogIn (howdoilogin@poa.st)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Nov-2022 17:18:11 JST HowDoILogIn

     in reply to

     • Herman_Hetherington
     @josh @Herman_Hetherington Wall of text incoming:
     
     Recently we found out the last 20 years of Alzheimer's studies have been a complete waste of money. This happens occasionally in the hard sciences, but in this case it was discovered we based all our research on *lies*. Not just outdated science, but falsified data. The hypothesis was sound, clear up Alzheimer's plaque in the brain and the brain can recover, but after 20 years of data not correlating with the original peer-reviewed report people started investigating and finding that everyone who peer-reviewed the original report was in a small tight-knit group that faked data and signed off on unproven bullshit. 20 years of funding and research from hundreds of colleges based on an intentional lie. This shook the hard sciences to the core, this is a story they are using now, and will use forever, to explain why faking data to support your hypothesis can be devastating.
     
     Now consider the Replication Crisis. 90% of all of Psychology and Sociology cannot be replicated, at all. These aren't real sciences, they're anecdote taken as evidence. A lot of people try to cite """studies""" to support these retarded ideas that women want to get raped and everyone's gay and incestuous.
     
     It's not fucking real. Unless their study involves an actual biologist showing something physically wrong with the brain like Schizophrenia, it's just someone's fantasy being signed off with a degree with the requirement of "show up and type long papers full of padding."
     josh likes this.