Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Saturday, 29-Aug-2026 14:16:51 JST silverpill

   in reply to

   • Benjamin Bouvier 🥐
   • elle

   @elle @bnjbvr Tangle doesn't look complicated. I think building something similar on ActivityPub shouldn't take much time, just make federated issues, PRs, and a very simple web interface - that would be enough for some people. Your ActivityForge project actually seems to be close to this "MVP" state.

   • Embed this notice
     elle (elle@weathered-steel.social)'s status on Saturday, 29-Aug-2026 14:16:52 JST elle

     in reply to

     • Benjamin Bouvier 🥐

     @bnjbvr almost entirely the funding, Tangled has enough VC money to not only fund full time developers, but also send people to table at conferences.

   • Embed this notice
     Benjamin Bouvier 🥐 (bnjbvr@tutut.delire.party)'s status on Saturday, 29-Aug-2026 14:16:53 JST Benjamin Bouvier 🥐

     in reply to

     also how did #Tangled achieve this so quickly on #ATProto? Is it a matter of funding people to work on it full-time? Or is it a matter of one protocol making it easier to achieve than another?

   • Embed this notice
     Benjamin Bouvier 🥐 (bnjbvr@tutut.delire.party)'s status on Saturday, 29-Aug-2026 14:16:55 JST Benjamin Bouvier 🥐

     I'm glad #Codeberg took the stance it did (and saying this as an occasional LLM user for coding). The strong reactions from people who are unhappy about the outcome are unfair IMO, though; it's Codeberg's servers and infra, of course they can set up the kind of usage policy they want, and kudos to them for doing it in a democratic way.

     I imagine the outcome of this would be more Forgejo instances, and I really yearn for ActivityPub-based decentralized forges now :blobcateyes: