Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   georgia (georgia@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:06:04 JST georgia
   if racism is based on real concerns than why has it changed so much throughout history? why were irish, japanese, etc barbaric then but cultured aryan/honorary aryan now?
   • Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Locked Librarian :labrys-45-sickle: (patchuun@social.xenofem.me)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:13:58 JST Locked Librarian :labrys-45-sickle:

     in reply to
     @georgia cuz it's not based on real concerns, it's cringe on bullshit ones
     georgia and Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: like this.
   • Embed this notice
     georgia (georgia@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:15:36 JST georgia

     in reply to

     • Locked Librarian :labrys-45-sickle:
     @patchuun there are lots of brown whitenats so their logic isnt exactly consistent. and the way the same things that make white people superior genetically apparently make jews evil (pushing above their weight).
     Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     georgia (georgia@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:17:17 JST georgia

     in reply to

     • lait accompli
     @genmaicha even if one were to assume good faith in racism like this, the fact that barbarians can be civilized disrupts the "genocide is the only solution, assimilation is impossible" rhetoric
   • Embed this notice
     lait accompli (genmaicha@stereophonic.space)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:17:18 JST lait accompli

     in reply to
     @georgia japan was probably considered barbaric because the period of isolation set back their technological progress relative to the west, but people began to view them more favorably once they modernized, unless you count the ww2 period where propaganda portrayed them as barbaric again.
     
     as for the irish, I don't think they're considered cultured by most westerners outside of america; and lots of americans have irish ancestry, so they're biased.
     
     maybe in britain the irish are seen a little better these days, but that's probably because third-world immigration has increased their relative standing.
   • Embed this notice
     georgia (georgia@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:22:23 JST georgia

     in reply to

     • lait accompli
     @genmaicha they usually self-civilize upon exposure to what is deemed "civilization", like many poor immigrants to america
   • Embed this notice
     lait accompli (genmaicha@stereophonic.space)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:22:25 JST lait accompli

     in reply to
     @georgia by what process do barbarians get civilized?
   • Embed this notice
     Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: (tk@bbs.kawa-kun.com)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 03:22:54 JST Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem:

     in reply to

     • Locked Librarian :labrys-45-sickle:

     @georgia @patchuun I think of Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks every time I see/hear non-white white nationalists. :blobfoxgooglymlem:

   • Embed this notice
     lait accompli (genmaicha@stereophonic.space)'s status on Monday, 22-Jun-2026 05:16:58 JST lait accompli

     in reply to
     @georgia I can see a good argument for that, but it also seems optimistic in light of our current social issues. maybe there's a difference between people who are only uncivilized because poor, and those who are constitutionally uncivilized.
     
     honestly I think personality traits and related things like civility are in large part inherited. maybe the self-civilizing effect was really because the more civilized immigrants succeeded in america and had more children, while the less civilized ones didn't. in that case, the biggest threat to civilization would come from our society not rewarding civilized behavior in that way anymore.
     georgia likes this.