GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    lcamtuf :verified: :verified: :verified: (lcamtuf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 13-Apr-2026 11:37:20 JST lcamtuf :verified: :verified: :verified: lcamtuf :verified: :verified: :verified:

    At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.

    When I push back, I get two reactions. Authors say that it just helps them express themselves. AI promoters say "get used to it".

    I don't think we should: it boils down to asymmetry. Our time here is limited. Social interaction on the internet breaks down if it takes ~0 effort to publish, but readers are still expected to use their own eyeballs and brains to engage.

    So, I feel that we have three choices:

    1) Refuse to engage with LLM writing *no matter if the article makes a good point or not*.

    2) Embrace it and have my agent argue with your agent forever, for internet points.

    3) Call it quits and move to an off-the-grid cabin in the woods.

    In conversation about 4 months ago from infosec.exchange permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: engage.so
      Customer Engagement for SaaS - Engage
      Engage, support and manage customers via email, SMS, push notifications, live chat and more.
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 13-Apr-2026 11:37:19 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to

      @lcamtuf I don't engage with that shit even when humans write it. I'm sure as hell not engaging when they didn't even bother.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 13-Apr-2026 17:23:54 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • jz.tusk

      @jztusk @lcamtuf This. If they're not saying anything that *couldn't have been interpolated from existing Orange Site drivel*, I don't much care if a human spent time slopping it together manually or used an LLM for it. Either way it's not reflecting any genuine thought and not worth reading.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      jz.tusk (jztusk@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 13-Apr-2026 17:23:55 JST jz.tusk jz.tusk
      in reply to

      @lcamtuf

      I don't have to *prove* something is LLM-produced to conclude "this writer didn't bother to make sure that their writing clearly isn't LLM", and then yeet them permanently into the "don't bother" list.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.