@SteveBellovin
Agreed to all that.
At this point I think I’ve managed to fully expunge exams from my teaching. There was one course where I suspended exams in 2020-2021, and found that there •was• loss for the students: “you have to think through this for yourself, using your own brain, on paper” turned out to serve a useful purpose for them. I now have a set of “conceptual puzzles,” machine-generated to allow infinite practice and infinite attempts, which seem to be filling that niche better than exams did.
In my mid- and upper-level courses, I’ve reached a point of good success with various “ungrading” and grade-as-afterthought strategies that put focus squarely where it belongs: on the learning and on the people. It’s proved harder in the intro courses, where the course may feel like a box to check and students don’t necessarily come in invested in the learning. In those courses, I refer to grading as “methadone for extrinsic motivation:” some of them are addicted to the external stimulus of grades, and I’m trying to get them unhooked.