@rusty__shackleford @soatok Trying to determine if this is bad snark on their part or the output of an AI agent
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 03-Mar-2026 22:17:26 JST
Christine Lemmer-Webber
-
Embed this notice
Soatok Dreamseeker (soatok@furry.engineer)'s status on Tuesday, 03-Mar-2026 22:17:25 JST
Soatok Dreamseeker
@cwebber @rusty__shackleford The "spell out the acronyms used in the filenames" part does gesture suggestively towards "AI"
The heel-turn on me allegedly not contacting them without an "You're absolutely right!" tells me that, even if it is AI, they at least edited the sycophancy out of it.
-
Embed this notice
Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 03-Mar-2026 22:18:01 JST
Christine Lemmer-Webber
@soatok @rusty__shackleford you're absolutely right
-
Embed this notice
Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Mar-2026 01:10:33 JST
Christine Lemmer-Webber
@tekhedd @rusty__shackleford @soatok I did end up thinking about this Nancy comic after I sent this this morning
-
Embed this notice
tekhedd (tekhedd@byteheaven.net)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Mar-2026 01:10:34 JST
tekhedd
@cwebber @rusty__shackleford @soatok I think the "the output length limit is a precondition" definitely stinks of AI, confusing pre and post like that. Either that or somebody is incredibly incompetent.
Resulting, now, in a situation where either someone has to admit how dumb they are or admit they let AI write this, which will result in a double down of angry denial, most likely.
-
Embed this notice