@RosaCtrl If it was, we wouldn't need types or static analysis.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Carlo Zancanaro (carlozancanaro@aus.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-2026 21:19:01 JST
Carlo Zancanaro
-
Embed this notice
Janneke (janneke@todon.nl)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-2026 21:19:00 JST
Janneke
@carlozancanaro @RosaCtrl
If it was, a computer would be intelligent. -
Embed this notice
Janneke (janneke@todon.nl)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-2026 21:20:44 JST
Janneke
@carlozancanaro @RosaCtrl
And also, I have been known to understand a program and find it elegant and correct, while the computer disagreed... -
Embed this notice
Janneke (janneke@todon.nl)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-2026 21:35:22 JST
Janneke
@carlozancanaro @RosaCtrl
Which is, incidentally, why I dislike mathematics; you cannot generally execute is and be certain it's correct. -
Embed this notice
Janneke (janneke@todon.nl)'s status on Sunday, 01-Mar-2026 21:40:35 JST
Janneke
@wynke @carlozancanaro @RosaCtrl
That sounds lovely! -
Embed this notice
Wynke (wynke@mendeddrum.org)'s status on Sunday, 01-Mar-2026 21:40:36 JST
Wynke
@janneke @carlozancanaro @RosaCtrl There are ways to do this. I wrote my Master's thesis about a language designed for it. Talk to me about it when we next meet if you want (although it's multiple decades ago so I'm a bit rusty on the subject).
-
Embed this notice