Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   daniel:// stenberg:// (bagder@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:24:43 JST daniel:// stenberg://

   the AI slop in security reports have developed slightly over time. Less mind-numbingly stupid reports now, but instead almost *everyone* writes their reports with AI so they still get overly long and complicated to plow through. And every follow-up question is another minor essay discussing pros and cons with bullet points and references to multiple specifications.

   Exhausting nonetheless.

   • Phantasm likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     James Morris (jmorris@social.kernel.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:26:38 JST James Morris

     in reply to
     @bagder I thought you said “exhausting nothingness” for a moment and I think that also fits generally.
   • Embed this notice
     Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:30:04 JST Rich Felker

     in reply to

     • Hugo 雨果

     @whynothugo @bagder Banning them is feasible.

   • Embed this notice
     daniel:// stenberg:// (bagder@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:30:05 JST daniel:// stenberg://

     in reply to

     • Hugo 雨果

     @whynothugo I would prefer if they tried using their brains

   • Embed this notice
     Hugo 雨果 (whynothugo@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:30:05 JST Hugo 雨果

     in reply to

     @bagder Same, I’m just staying within the domain of what’s feasible.

   • Embed this notice
     Hugo 雨果 (whynothugo@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Jan-2026 19:30:07 JST Hugo 雨果

     in reply to

     @bagder whenever I ask an LLM something, I prefix my question with “briefly:” or “be concise”.

     I’m curious if this would work, considering that many may copy-paste your response into an LLM.