Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Boomercon faggot has it spelled out that he's a dying breed and we don't care if some radical shitlib wins. Just as long as it's not the jeet invader.
Voating might be fake & gay. Nobody is truly ourguy. But dismantling the path to power for these bootstrap boomers is the first step in correcting the course of the ship.
I hope Casey Putsch has a speech in a beer hall. Hopefully he's a spoiler to viveeek. If he wins, even better.
- BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
-
Embed this notice
@catmanmancat exciting to watch.
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat Revelation 18 yes, but we don’t know if this is the time. Remember Nineveh and what God sent Jonah to do. Who can know if there isn’t redemption in our future but God alone.
-
Embed this notice
imagine not being black pilled (I'm totally here to watch it burn to the ground. Revelation 18)
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat Always has been
-
Embed this notice
Its pretty clpse to time brother
Futurist revelation is a jesuit fiction
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat Also am I correct that you’re implying premillenialism is a Jesuit psyops to discredit Protestants?
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat >Sid Meier’s: Christian Identity
Interesting. Particularly the inclusion of the apocrypha at the end
>2 Esdras 6:9
>“For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth.”
I’m a bad Cathodox because I’ve never read this.
-
Embed this notice
I love this video. makes a nice visual of a lot of Revelation.
-
Embed this notice
>premillennialism
I hate these "millennial" terms because it fundamentally misunderstands what the millennia in Rev is (it already happened though)
But in this case your post is exactly correct, and it isn't even a unique interpretation by me, or by "we wuz" people.
>During the Reformation, historicism was the dominant view.[7] All, or nearly all of the reformers saw the pope as Antichrist.[8] Futurism emerged after this time as a Roman Catholic response to historicism.[9] This rise of futurism is generally associated with a Jesuit priest named Francisco Ribera (1537–1591).[10] Ribera is said to have developed his scheme for the purpose of refuting historicism and its papal antichrist.[11] A scheme similar to Ribera's was put forward by Italian archbishop Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621).[10]
From Ribera's wiki page. Now I don't think the Pope is the antichrist because there is no "antichrist" as virtually everyone sees it, or at least there is not ONLY a singular antichrist, because all jews (all non-Christians in fact) are "antichrist" as John says. But Rev 13 makes it pretty clear that the revived beast is the Catholic church, and futurism is meant to dispel this belief so as to maintain the hold the RCC has on Christendom.
-
Embed this notice
@leyonhjelm @Xenophon @catmanmancat Eventually I will. It’s not in my Bible.
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle
then go fuckin read it you stubborn dipshit
@Xenophon @catmanmancat
-
Embed this notice
@leyonhjelm @Xenophon @Robert_Edwardly @catmanmancat I tend to focus on the cannon rather than apocrypa
-
Embed this notice
@Robert_Edwardly @leyonhjelm @Xenophon @catmanmancat You guys are acting like this is a common thing that every Christian reads, and I’ve barely heard of it.
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @Robert_Edwardly @Xenophon @catmanmancat no we’re just saying we live in an era of unprecedented access to information.
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @leyonhjelm @Xenophon @catmanmancat Bible gateway is your friend
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @leyonhjelm @Xenophon @Robert_Edwardly @catmanmancat it's a good website for reading, that's what i use it for
-
Embed this notice
@BowsacNoodle @leyonhjelm @Xenophon @Robert_Edwardly @catmanmancat > cannon
-
Embed this notice
@nine2fivestudio @leyonhjelm @Xenophon @Robert_Edwardly @catmanmancat Autocorrect kills me
-
Embed this notice
Everything in the video is backed by historical record.
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat I won’t deny the possibility, but the impossibility of mapping the real people becomes apparent. The Ethiopian eunuch heard the gospel and immediately converted, which says something IMO. I basically think it doesn’t matter because you would functionally need to treat everyone as potentially a lost brother, watch puts us right back at the same point. Furthermore the judgement you bring upon yourself if you’re wrong and you push others away from Christ is not good. You’d likely argue predestination, which i reject and were thusly at the same point. Christ isn’t gate kept by birthright, and if He was we are still better off assuming anyone we encounter is in need of salvation regardless of their lineage.
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @catmanmancat interesting. I don’t recall reading that, but I will have to. remind me of this later. merry Christmas brother
-
Embed this notice
>The Ethiopian eunuch heard the gospel and immediately converted
You imagine you know what this man looked like because there is a modern country named ethiopia. I've demonstrated that historical record disagrees with this. Diodorus Siculus recorded what the people from that region looked like, and the ones that are black aren't considered human to him.
>Acts 8:27
>And he rose and went. And behold, an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a minister of the Can′dace, queen of the Ethiopians, in charge of all her treasure, had come to Jerusalem to worship
Lets ignore that no queen was putting a nigger in charge of her treasure, the simple fact is that this man WAS A "JEW" because if he weren't he never would have been in Jerusalem worshipping. He never would of had a copy of Isaiah nor would he have been reading it and wondering as to its meaning. That's how it worked. Only "JEWS" went to Jerusalem to worship. Being a "JEW" wasn't something that anyone could be.
>Furthermore the judgement you bring upon yourself if you’re wrong
I reject this wholesale. You face no extra judgement. That's Catholic guilt that has been adopted by every denomination. And anyway I don't tell niggers not to worship God, but there is a big difference between forcing people away from God and not proselytizing to them. I don't go around proselytizing to anyway.
edit: wanted to add some more to this.
>You’d likely argue predestination would prevent the right people from rejecting the message
This is also misunderstood. Acceptance of the message is not necessary for salvation. That's the point of the unconditional promise. Salvation and reward are not the same things, but all children of Jacob will be saved. Most of them rejected Yahweh from the beginning, up until Jesus. That's why Jesus came and paid the price, to bring the prodigal children back to God. But even atheists will still be resurrected if they are children of Jacob. Not a single grain of wheat will be missed.
-
Embed this notice
@Xenophon @BowsacNoodle @catmanmancat
Universalism lead us to individualism and it inflated away the value of humanity.
You can be happy with a nugget of gold, or you can adulterate it with mercury and convince yourself it's just as valuable.
-
Embed this notice
Also Merry Christmas
RW Fren Squads
BowserNoodle ☦️
Sturmführer Xeno Fish Biscuits
Leyonhjelm
:njp:Robert_Edwardly :windmill_of_friendship: ??
milkposter
nine2fivestudio
pepsi_man
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the