@anokasion It doesn't really affect much at all - there was the "energy star" certification (the GNUbootable ThinkPads have that) and for decades windows has implemented power saving modes - but it was always possible to disable the throttling and set "performance mode" in windows (although crappy windows laptops have drivers that reduce clocks aggressively on battery to make the battery last more than a pitiful amount of time).
The real reason for the slowdowns is intentionally incompetent programming to make the software even slower yet again - every time CPUs get ~2x faster, proprietary software gets ~2.5x slower to compensate - so you better go and buy a new computer.
When it comes to power consumption, I did some calculations ages ago and it is far more energy efficient to keep using already manufactured "power inefficient" computers for several decades than it is to manufacture new hardware.
MX GNU/Linux certainly isn't the best as it's proprietary software.
GPLv3: "You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or run a copy of the Program. Ancillary propagation of a covered work occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance."
GNU software is not bloated - although speed and memory use are a tradeoff, GNU software frankly uses little memory while offering extensive functionality.
GNU software is the most reliable software you can get.
Very old tests confirmed that GNU software was more reliable than proprietary software and the software has had bugs worked out and test cases written over the decades between; https://www.gnu.org/software/reliability.en.html
Although portability is prioritized over speed, GNU software is not slow - often it is the fastest software available.
@ube@anokasion >its superior foss alternatives "FOSS" degeneracy is all proprietary.
> probably because heres a billion and one half assed nonstandard double dash proprietary to GNU switches on everything slowing it down Pretty much everything uses getopt() or getopt_long(), which is quite fast and adds pretty much no overhead - there is no possible slowdown once the argument parsing is done regardless.
The long options argument format is well documented and everyone is welcome to document it - parts of it has gone into POSIX.
The added options are to add essential GNU functionality that is severely lacking in inferior clones of GNU.
@Suiseiseki@anokasion GNU software tends to run slower and use more memory than its superior foss alternatives probably because heres a billion and one half assed nonstandard double dash proprietary to GNU switches on everything slowing it down
>GNU is the clone of bsd GNU had nothing to do with BSD - GNU originally cloned Unix - but it has gone so far beyond, Unix and the BSD's are like wet toilet paper to GNU/Car.
The BSD's had to be convinced by GNU and others to stop being completely proprietary and all BSDs are still proprietary.
>i tthink the only gnutardatiton i use is probably bash arrays on rare occasion You likely use far more fine GNU extensions without realizing it.
@Suiseiseki@anokasion > "FOSS" degeneracy is all proprietary. yes which is why i'm only talking about FOSS soluttions like GNU
> The added options are to add essential GNU functionality that is severely lacking in inferior clones of GNU. GNU is the clone of bsd and its very much not essential i tthink the only gnutardatiton i use is probably bash arrays on rare occasion
@ube@anokasion >yes bsd is unix. No BSD is a Unix - as to qualify for that trademark you need to pay and pass an extremely proprietary POSIX test-suite.
Although BSDs were originally developed from Unix code, pretty much all of it has been rewritten now.
>they have less restrictive licenses than the gpl Those contain several proprietary programs without source code which certainly restrict the user.
No GPL version contains restrictions - all of such licenses give the user the 4 freedoms that the user otherwise wouldn't have under copyright law - the user just isn't granted the power to apply restrictions.
@Suiseiseki@anokasion > GNU had nothing to do with BSD - GNU originally cloned Unix - but it has gone so far beyond, Unix and the BSD's are like wet toilet paper to GNU/Car. yes bsd is unix. > all BSDs are still proprietary. actually they have less restrictive licenses than the gpl which are nearly free, the zero clause is a rare truly free license > You likely use far more fine GNU extensions without realizing it. would be hard when i dont use gnu myself directly. i am on gentoo though so unfortunately these roottkits waiting to happen have to stay for portage
@ube@anokasion Have you considered that you are completely wrong?
macos is a Unix as apple paid the fee and managed to pass the POSIX test suite.
Although some code from macos was copied from BSDs, there was a lot of other code added from elsewhere, plus a lot of custom code was developed - therefore macos is not a BSD.