Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   WWIII_ENJOYER (wwiii_enjoyer@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 06:45:29 JST WWIII_ENJOYER

   • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
   @Ghislaine I'm eyeballing that "should" because if I recall correctly, Randy Fine is a 400 pound shitbag and a citizen of israel himself.
   • Embed this notice
     Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 06:45:23 JST Blurry Moon

     in reply to

     • pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ?
     • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
     • cool_boy_mew
     @coolboymew @pinemarten @Ghislaine @WWIII_ENJOYER all you have to do is renounce that foreign citizenship. You already are supposed to do that when you turn 18.
   • Embed this notice
     cool_boy_mew (coolboymew@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 06:45:24 JST cool_boy_mew

     in reply to

     • pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ?
     • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
     @pinemarten @Ghislaine @WWIII_ENJOYER It's ultimately "pointless" in that a lot of countries has ancestry citizenship (forgot the exact term)
   • Embed this notice
     pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ? (pinemarten@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 06:45:25 JST pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ?

     in reply to

     • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
     @WWIII_ENJOYER @Ghislaine
     This has to be some kosher bait and switch.
   • Embed this notice
     pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ? (pinemarten@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 07:08:18 JST pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ?

     in reply to

     • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
     • cool_boy_mew
     • Blurry Moon

     @sun @coolboymew @Ghislaine @WWIII_ENJOYER You nominally surrender your citizenship, although there is no enforcement. There was a court case in the 1960s (of course) and it involved a jew (of course).

     Afroyim v. Rusk was decided on May 29, 1967, when the Supreme Court ruled that citizens of the United States may not be deprived of their citizenship involuntarily Wikipedia. The case involved Beys Afroyim, a Polish-born naturalized U.S. citizen who had voted in an Israeli election. The government attempted to revoke his citizenship, but the Supreme Court decided that his right to retain citizenship was guaranteed by the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

     Congress should make a law clarifying this and forbidding dual citizenship, but or course they won't as they are owned by jews and a lot of Europeans also do this (they are faggots).

     Blurry Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-Oct-2025 07:10:48 JST Blurry Moon

     in reply to

     • pinemarten :njp::windmill_of_friendship: ?
     • Ghislaine :dancing_z:
     • cool_boy_mew
     @pinemarten @Ghislaine @WWIII_ENJOYER @coolboymew strange considering we do sometimes revoke citizenship of naturalized citizens for severe crimes so clearly the constitutional interpretation is not absolute