I'm a bit worried tho, that even if the browser itself is really well crafted, the web continues to enshittify in such a way that most services depend on shady components anyway.
For example: if u want to use a linux phone to escape google spying on you? shame, you depend on google play services to run national auth. services such as BankID.
@herzmut@vkc As long as a line gets drawn, I think we're all on the same page.
Technically my line hasn't been drawn yet, because I don't like any of the alternative options. FF, for me, is still the least-bad option. But being able to look back on the lines people have drawn, that's useful, because it will let us know if Mozilla ever gets back on track.
(I can see that things are not looking promising for that scenario.)
@kboyd@herzmut@vkc The point of the line isn't refraining from using Firefox (it belongs to us not to them) but treating Mozilla as the enemy. Not donating to them, mocking them, calling for them to be ousted, hardening our systems against their ability to deploy malicious updates, disabling and teaching others how to disable malicious functionality, etc.
@worik@stovis@Siilwyn@kboyd@herzmut@vkc I'm not gonna do your homework for you. Initially there was the refusal to fix badly gendered language with an attitude that fixing it would be "political". Then there was the minstrel style custom emoji. Then more and more red flags. The person above doesn't seem to be important in the project but seems to have been actively reflecting the culture that these folks are happy to be a nazi bar.
@karadoc@stovis@Siilwyn@kboyd@herzmut@vkc It wasn't that they didn't change it right away. It's that they slipped up and revealed their values and who they want to include and exclude from the community. If they were just slow/silent not changing it, we wouldn't have had any warning, but they explicitly said they wanted to be "apolitical" (welcoming nazis).
@dalias@stovis@Siilwyn@kboyd@herzmut@vkc So, because they didn't immediately changing the wording of their documentation when asked - the whole project is permanently dead to you. Ouch.
If even the slightest temporary misstep is enough to kill the reputation of any new project, then there isn't really any hope for positive change.
Real humans are generally not perfect; especially when they don't have a full-time media-management team.
The ladybird team made a mistake. It was a minor mistake. They have acknowledged it and corrected it. Surely that's enough. Right?
@karadoc This is akin to "slipping up" by using the N word. It's not something that happens to someone who doesn't actually think that way. It's giving a glimpse at who they really are.
If this were a mistake they would have apologized profusely, backtracked and fixed policy. Not doubled down and demanded that everyone agree they'd done nothing wrong. Like all of their fans (see: you and the other one I blocked earlier) keep doing.
Why would you assume that their slip-up was about a hidden inner evil, rather than *literally anything else*?
Have you never in your life said something that you regret? Misspoke? Misread a situation and chose your words poorly? Missed some nuance in what you were saying and ended up conveying the wrong idea? These things have happened to me, and to basically everyone I know. I can imagine that also happen to people volunteering their time to make a web browser too.
So in the absence of other evidence, I think it really is safe to assume that not immediately updating the documentation for their work probably does *not* mean that they are secretly nazis. Seriously. There are countless other interpretations that do not require drawing such a long bow. And there are enough real nazis in the world that we don't have to shadowbox with imaginary ones.