Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Earl The Pearls (earlthepearls@social.quodverum.com)'s status on Sunday, 27-Jul-2025 07:28:44 JST Earl The Pearls

   The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold President Donald Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship, granting the Trump administration's request to partially pause rulings by federal judges blocking the order.

   https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

   https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/supreme-court-sides-with-trump-administration-on-nationwide-injunctions-in-birthright-citizenship-case/

   • Embed this notice
     djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Sunday, 27-Jul-2025 07:28:44 JST djsumdog

     in reply to

     The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold President Donald Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship

     No they did not. Did you read the article or the decision? They challenged the emergency injunctions by lower courts. (In their previous ruling, they states lower courts needed class actions in order to not violate the authority granted to them under the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789).

     They didn't rule on birthright citizenship itself (which they shouldn't That honestly needs to be done by Congress) only that cases now need to be brought forward individually.

     I generally agree with this legal stance. I'd be against SCOTUS ruling on the constitutional of the executive order, because the constitution (ArtI.S8.C4.1.1) grants that power specifically to congress, not the courts.

     BowserNoodle ☦️ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     karnage (karnage@social.quodverum.com)'s status on Sunday, 27-Jul-2025 08:21:53 JST karnage

     in reply to

     • djsumdog

     @djsumdog @EarlThePearls

     Thanks for the clarification.

     djsumdog likes this.