So, this is very interesting to me. I hadn't considered them intertwined, but in "The Ministry for the Future" Kim Stanley Robinson makes the federated social network a crucial part of mitigation.
Here's why I think the fediverse is important for the climate emergency.
First, because disinformation thrives on big social networks. The fediverse seems more responsive to bad ideas spreading.
Second, because federation is more friendly to cross-border collaboration. Nation-states are very suspicious of media headquartered in a superpower like the US or China, but will probably be more relaxed about federated systems.
Third, adaptation is going to require some local resiliency. Having networks that are local to a region and stay up through disasters is going to be a big help.
Anyway, my response would be "somewhat important". The federated social network isn't as important as, say, eliminating coal-generated electricity or finding a better recipe for concrete. But it's probably a net positive for climate change.
And fair warning: the two biggest things I've worked on in my career have been the federated social network and climate change, so I'm likely to overstate the connections.
@evan What's your take on resources used to power the federated infrastructure? Isn't having lots of nodes more problematic than say two or three data centers around the globe?
@vinzv I also think that a global climate emergency requires global real-time coordination, so we can't really afford not to use these tools right now.
@evan Nation-states may act against specific platforms, but it is less likely that they would ban a protocol -- a whole way of interacting with the network.
One might block a website, but banning the use of HTTP would be dramatically different. One might block Gmail, but not email (SMTP, POP, etc). Similarly, Mastodon.social might be blocked, but banning ActivityPub use seems much less likely.
@evan My initial thought was that single nodes would have smaller footprints. But that would only work with nodes not running Mastodon or Friendica, I guess.
One interesting thing in that regard is SSB (Secure Scuttlebutt) as works off grid and does not need constantly running/connected nodes. But it comes with a price tag regarding convenience, unfortunately. But still!
@brettpeary sorry, I worked on one then the other. Currently working at Open Earth Foundation, where we make Open Source software to fight climate change.
@Gupperduck@rysiek I don't know enough to say. I do know that Metcalfe's law says that value of a communications network goes up with the square of the number of nodes, so growth is going to accelerate.
Hello, I hope you don't mind a question from a curious newbie. (Apologies if yes - I'm just finding my feet.)
Do you think the movement toward the fediverse has reached a rolling momentum now that government ministries, institutions and organisations are setting up their own public facing instances/servers?
@evan heh… I don't know the full context around this excerpt, but I don't necessarily think it is wrong.
I feel open, decentralized protocols have *staying power* that's hard to overstate. E-mail is still here, for better or worse, half a century after its inception, and so far all attempts at replacing it failed.
Why? I think that's because the protocols it relies on are decentralized and open, meaning anyone can implement it, anyone can run their own compatible thingy.
@brettpeary oh. Yeah. I forgot you don't know about that.
I started one of the early federated social networks, Identi.ca, and the software it ran, GNU Social.
I helped create the protocol that it used for communication, OStatus. Then I wrote another distributed software server, pump.io. That software's protocol was the basis for ActivityPub, the protocol that Mastodon uses.
I was co-chair of the Social Web Working Group that standardized ActivityPub. I also co-authored Activity Streams 2.0.
@evan sorry my question is ambiguous. You said you worked on the federated social network? Is that Mastadon or something else? What did you do related to it. Super cool. Just curious.
@brettpeary Beside all this, I convened a series of meetings called the Federated Social Web Summit that brought together people working on different social software projects. I think it was a big help in getting people to focus on standards.
And I helped out with various standards like Activity Streams 1.0 and Webfinger.
@evan@brettpeary This sounds fascinating, Evan. Thank you for all your contributions to the common good.
I'm curious about the OEF and the software work - is there any way for 3rd parties like me to be of help? Though my software dev expertise might be a bit misaligned with open source