Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 06:37:30 JST David Revoy

   • Creative Commons

   Dear @creativecommons ,

   I read your article about your initiative for new licenses for dataset holders in the AI industry.

   Let’s be clear: I do not want to re-license my hundreds of CC-By comic pages to please AI giants.

   I wish you would support CC artists suffering from massive plagiarism. You should enforce your own existing licenses against AI mass crawling. It seems you’ve joined the battle only after the casualties and still managed to side with the wrong people.

   https://creativecommons.org/2025/06/25/introducing-cc-signals-a-new-social-contract-for-the-age-of-ai/

   • Puniko ? and pistolero like this.
   • Puniko ?, Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and Aral Balkan and 2 others repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 21:26:02 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • Creative Commons

     @creativecommons Psss! After reading all those comments here, I just had to channel my inner artist. So, here’s my new logo for you; because clearly, you need all the help you can get in your new mission. You're welcome! 😂

     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and Puniko ? like this.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 21:39:02 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Creative Commons

     @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org @creativecommons@mastodon.social Shouldn't the answer be simple? If you use the BY license you're supposed to give appropriate attribution when you use the work to train an AI model. Why would this somehow be different now?

   • Embed this notice
     Leah (leah@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 21:55:35 JST Leah

     in reply to

     • Creative Commons

     @davidrevoy "building a more equitable, sustainable AI ecosystem rooted in shared benefits" Shared benefits? LOL. I don't want to share anything with fascist, world burning billionaires and their dream machines.

     I don't see why we need extra signals and I don't see how it would help if their bots circumvent any measures and contracts we had for ages. The ones who have to change are not we who want to share and value an open internet, its them who must change! @creativecommons

   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 22:01:06 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • Oblomov

     @oblomov Thank you and sure! Feel free to reuse it. I can't apply a CC license to it because the CC logo is trademarked, but let's say it's for 'fair use' and only on a non commercial and humorous purposes. 😉

     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Oblomov (oblomov@sociale.network)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 22:01:07 JST Oblomov

     in reply to

     • Creative Commons

     @davidrevoy

     I like that, mind if I add it to my article here https://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/ai-signal/ when it's published online? 8-D

     @creativecommons

   • Embed this notice
     David Revoy (davidrevoy@framapiaf.org)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 23:28:17 JST David Revoy

     in reply to

     • joël

     @jollysea Thank you for linking it here. Yes, I read it yesterday and added my +1 to many threads.

     However, I don't expect them to change their minds or publish something about coming back on what they wrote.

     Creative Commons relies mainly on subsidies, so if they move in this direction, it's probably to follow the money. I'm sure they'll invent a new ethics policy to justify this and demonise anyone who opposes their plans...

     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     joël (jollysea@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Jun-2025 23:28:19 JST joël

     in reply to

     @davidrevoy They have a forum on github: https://github.com/creativecommons/cc-signals/discussions

     Would be cool if more people commented there, so they can't just ignore "a few people on mastodon".