GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jun-2025 02:05:05 JST casey is remote casey is remote
    in reply to
    • Protoss
    • Ube Maija

    @ube @Cyrillic I've never seen a pretzel quite like the person who claims that this passage doesn't condemn homosexuality 🙃

    In conversation about a year ago from noauthority.social permalink
    • Another Linux Walt Alt likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jun-2025 02:05:06 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      • Protoss
      @Cyrillic @realcaseyrollins a more direct translation from aramaic of romans 1:27:
      > And again also their males in this way abandoned the natural need for females, and they were ravished with desire one for another, even male for male, and committed disgrace and received a right reward in their persons for their error.
      this is about lust and hedonism not homoesxuality. there is an implication that male on male hedonistic desire is worse, that lust for a woman is more natural, but it feels very clear to me this is about hedonistic sex rather than to make children
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ube Maija (ube@spergia.net)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jun-2025 02:05:07 JST Ube Maija Ube Maija
      in reply to
      @realcaseyrollins which is just about the only thing i ever hear cited even though by the trans logic wearing a mans clothes as a trans woman or a womans clothes as a trans man would be crossdressing because a trans woman is a woman and a trans man is a man. it's all based on preexisting assumption if you are transphobic it's transphobic if you're not its not. anyways as far as i can tell it's not incompatible with christianity at all. same with homosexuality which again the most cited verses are talking about pederasty specifically
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Protoss (cyrillic@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jun-2025 02:05:07 JST Protoss Protoss
      in reply to
      • Ube Maija
      @ube @realcaseyrollins Romans 1 is the most homophobic thing ever written
      Romans 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
      Romans 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
      Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
      Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
      Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
      Romans 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
      Romans 1:30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
      Romans 1:31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
      Romans 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      casey is remote (realcaseyrollins@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jun-2025 02:05:08 JST casey is remote casey is remote
      • Ube Maija

      @ube Well not for nothing but there were Levitical laws against cross-dressing as well

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.