GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:03 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars

    "Uncertainty about the future and concerns about the ecological impact of the growing human #population were key factors also identified by research.

    But concerns also differed in different parts of the world, Dillarstone said. “There was a concern that came out only in Zambia and Ethiopia, which was about a family’s ability to subsist and acquire resources,” she said."

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/09/more-people-not-having-children-due-to-climate-breakdown-fears-finds-research

    In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
      More people not having children due to climate breakdown fears, finds research
      from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/damien-gayle
      Analysis finds concerns about environment key factor in having fewer or no children – but reasons differ around world
    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:01 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      Global Population Crash Isn't Sci-Fi Anymore

      "The European Commission’s Centre of Expertise on #Population and Migration projects that the global population will peak at 9.8 billion in the 2070s.

      It is simply because, all over the world, the #TotalFertilityRate (TFR) — the number of live children the average woman bears in her lifetime — has been falling since the 1970s. In one country after another, it has dropped under the 2.1 value of the 'replacement rate'."

      https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-03-10/global-population-collapse-isn-t-sci-fi-anymore-niall-ferguson

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments



    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:01 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      "Generally, to replace and maintain current populations, a birth rate of 2.1 children per woman is required.

      According to a 2024 US Central Intelligence Agency publication comparing fertility rates around the world, in India, the 1950 #BirthRate of 6.2 has plummeted to just above 2; it is projected to fall to 1.29 by 2050 and just 1.04 by 2100. The fertility rate in Nepal is now just 1.85; in Bangladesh, 2.07."

      https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/13/choosing-to-be-child-free-in-an-apocalyptic-south-asia

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.aljazeera.com
        Choosing to be child-free in an ‘apocalyptic’ South Asia
        from Sarah Shamim
        Why are some South Asians choosing not to have children amid a population crisis?
      Mr. Bill repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:02 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      Population growth varies across the planet. You can look it up for a specific place by searching for #TotalFertilityRate (the average number of babies per woman) for that place.

      The graph below shows that TFR is
      1.64 United States
      1.40 Canada
      1.28 China

      For a stable population, TFR = 2.1. Meaning, the US population is growing slightly only because of immigration.

      In South Korea, TFR = 0.84.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/386/478/988/867/918/original/2f84a067f2f44ae8.png

    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:02 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      I learned about population, growth, and total fertility rate from this TED talk by the late Hans Rosling, a scientist with an irrepressible way of talking about statistics as not only interesting but exciting and funny.

      It's from 2006 but the trends in population growth have continued since then.

      https://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen?language=en

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:03 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the "population bomb" was a Thing.
      Now, not so much.

      Yes, the world population is still growing. But the *rate* of growth is decreasing fast, and most demographers predict a population peak this century.

      One of the best places for a reality check is this #OurWorldInData page:
      https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth

      Includes a link to visualisations, some interactive.

      https://ourworldindata.org/population-growth-over-time

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/386/450/819/036/909/original/3d922cffbf53e3cf.png

    • Embed this notice
      CelloMom On Cars (cellomomoncars@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Jun-2025 02:22:08 JST CelloMom On Cars CelloMom On Cars
      in reply to

      Back in the 1800s, women all over the world had, on average, 6 babies.

      European women were the first to start having fewer babies.
      Why?
      The Industrial Revolution started in Europe.

      This graph shows that as each region developed, women in that region have fewer babies. Today, highly developed nations have low total fertility rates: 1.4 in Europe, 1.8 in the US, even 0.8 in South Korea. Regions that have a higher birth rate simply started developing later.

      https://www.gapminder.org/topics/babies-per-woman/

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/625/451/652/107/633/original/5b18f811cd3b9bf5.png

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.