GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Libre Solutions Network (lsn@fedi.libresolutions.network)'s status on Wednesday, 28-May-2025 02:21:12 JST Libre Solutions Network Libre Solutions Network

    Cool Concepts That Deserve More Recognition

    >...obscurity or lack of mass adoption is not actually failure. Ambitious attempts themselves are valuable experiments regardless of how they end up. Often times, newer projects are inspired or informed from techniques that were tried in the past. It’s high time we embrace the “freedom in freedom” and learn to explore possibilities rather than fight over dogmatic preferences and approaches.

    In conversation about 4 days ago from fedi.libresolutions.network permalink
    • Embed this notice
      djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Wednesday, 28-May-2025 02:21:10 JST djsumdog djsumdog
      in reply to
      • xianc78
      Yea, ZeroNet quickly became filled with illegal content, which you could be distributing just by viewing. There were a ton of fixable things in the issue tracker that the original dev just sort of game up on, and then the trackers stopped working. I was not aware of the 8chan bunker incident.
      In conversation about 4 days ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Wednesday, 28-May-2025 02:21:11 JST xianc78 xianc78
      in reply to

      @lsn
      ZeroNet had a major flaw in that it required a certificate to post anything. This is fine for sites like blogs, forums, or wikis, but for anonymous sites like pastebins or imageboards, it doesn't work so well. There was an 8chan bunker on ZeroNet when the original site went down. They had some hack solution that automatically generated and rotated keys to maintain some level of anonymity. It didn't work out and journalists also exposed that many users on said bunker were using the site with their bare IP, which was another problem as ZeroNet was not anonymous on it's own. All that on top of the fact that you seed an entire website, including any illegal content that someone may have upload made people lose faith in the project. The lead developer seemed to have stopped working on it around the same time as the failed 8chan bunker incident.

      As for OpenNIC, I feel like the thing that is holding it back right now is that it doesn't address VPN, proxy, and Tor users, as you are using their DNS servers instead of your own, so unless your VPN server is using an OpenNIC DNS server, then it won't be able to connect to an OpenNIC site. It also doesn't address something like emailing from a server with an ICANN domain to a server with an OpenNIC domain as the ICANN email server needs to be connected to an OpenNIC server in order to recognize it.

      In conversation about 4 days ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Wednesday, 28-May-2025 04:25:01 JST silverpill silverpill
      in reply to

      @lsn

      ZeroNet had many forks. One of them is still active:

      https://github.com/zeronet-conservancy/zeronet-conservancy

      In conversation about 4 days ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.