Is there a third-party browser extension or website to restore the comments section to YouTube (and other sites that selectively disable comments on some content?)
@eriner it's possible the only reason it got removed was it was associated with gab, but consider the type of stuff people will use this extension for (not that I mind but) it could get heat from browsers. I would like to do it as a greasemonkey extension so they can't block it
@eriner@JollyWizard you have to turn off a bunch of security in chrome to load a local extension from the filesystem and in firefox you have to use the unbranded developer version of the browser, it's impossible with the stock version
@sun I think offering it that way makes sense, but as @JollyWizard pointed out, removal from the chrome store doesn't mean that you can't distribute it directly, right?
@eriner@JollyWizard that part shouldn't be a problem, it's because of a new standard for extensions that breaks ublock, but the new standard would work for this fine. the issue with chrome and firefox is that if you do anything interesting related to bypassing moderation they are interested in stopping you
@sun@JollyWizard Hmm. I'll investigate more this evening, but if it's really a hassle then that gives credence to your idea to do it as a userscript, though I worry that may be quite cumbersome.
I also know that uBlock and other extensions are actively being fucked over by Google, but I'm unfamiliar with the technical specifics.
@ndz@JollyWizard@eriner there was actually one in like the 1990s but it got killed by a copyright lawsuit because you are putting user content on someone else's website. It's probably legally relevant but I choose not to worry about it. I also can't remember the name.
@JollyWizard@eriner@sun there was another one before gab tried it. At the time I thought it was going to be great but then it died almost immediately. Ill try to remember the name... I may still have it.
@sun@eriner looked into it more and you are correct. the whole thing has gotten super fucky.
I knew they had escalated the blocking of local deployments due to sketchy bloatware installs hijacking homepages with extensions etc, and that had affected things like deploying ublocks automically, but I was under the impression that third party web extensions had the right to self host from their own domain, pending a user UI approval for install, which is apparently not the case.
Super gay.
However, a prepackaged distribution of chromium or Firefox, similar to how the tor browser is distributed, could be built with some ci automation.
I know people who have tried the tor browser. People try new browsers. I don't know one person IRL who has used greasemonkey. Technically a solution but it has a ux smell.