GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:01:09 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton

    Is there a third-party browser extension or website to restore the comments section to YouTube (and other sites that selectively disable comments on some content?)

    In conversation about 7 months ago from noauthority.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:01:08 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      @eriner I have wanted to make this for years
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:04:56 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      @eriner consideration is that gab tried to do this and their extension got removed from chrome, but I'm willing to try.
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:04:57 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • Blurry Moon

      @sun I just bought commentary.social, want to work on it together? (I'm open to other names, was just the first thing that popped in my head.)

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:10:43 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      @eriner it's possible the only reason it got removed was it was associated with gab, but consider the type of stuff people will use this extension for (not that I mind but) it could get heat from browsers. I would like to do it as a greasemonkey extension so they can't block it
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:10:44 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • Blurry Moon

      @sun I'll look into that more, I wasn't aware of it or any details of how they implemented it.

      Just seems like a sorely missing utility, and one that could only be provided by people who have demonstrated a bonafide belief in freedom of speech.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:15:34 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      @eriner @JollyWizard you have to turn off a bunch of security in chrome to load a local extension from the filesystem and in firefox you have to use the unbranded developer version of the browser, it's impossible with the stock version
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:15:35 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon

      @sun I think offering it that way makes sense, but as @JollyWizard pointed out, removal from the chrome store doesn't mean that you can't distribute it directly, right?

      Here is the extension, abandoned six years ago: https://github.com/gab-ai-inc/gab-dissenter-extension/

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
        GitHub - gab-ai-inc/gab-dissenter-extension: Dissenter.com Browser Extension source code
        Dissenter.com Browser Extension source code. Contribute to gab-ai-inc/gab-dissenter-extension development by creating an account on GitHub.
    • Embed this notice
      JollyWizard (jollywizard@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:19:54 JST JollyWizard JollyWizard
      in reply to
      • Blurry Moon
      @sun @eriner can't you just use the URL web extensions install method and approve the domain through the built in UI.

      I thought the issue with local filesystem is that it could bypass user approval. hence why you can't script extension installs for ff anymore.
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:19:54 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      @JollyWizard @eriner do you mean in firefox? link me to more details
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:23:27 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      @eriner @JollyWizard that part shouldn't be a problem, it's because of a new standard for extensions that breaks ublock, but the new standard would work for this fine. the issue with chrome and firefox is that if you do anything interesting related to bypassing moderation they are interested in stopping you
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Hamilton (eriner@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:23:28 JST Matt Hamilton Matt Hamilton
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon

      @sun @JollyWizard Hmm. I'll investigate more this evening, but if it's really a hassle then that gives credence to your idea to do it as a userscript, though I worry that may be quite cumbersome.

      I also know that uBlock and other extensions are actively being fucked over by Google, but I'm unfamiliar with the technical specifics.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:25:24 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon
      @eriner @JollyWizard another possibility is somehow integrate it into a different open source youtube frontend
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:37:00 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Nick
      @ndz @JollyWizard @eriner there was actually one in like the 1990s but it got killed by a copyright lawsuit because you are putting user content on someone else's website. It's probably legally relevant but I choose not to worry about it. I also can't remember the name.
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Nick (ndz@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:37:02 JST Nick Nick
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon

      @JollyWizard @eriner @sun there was another one before gab tried it. At the time I thought it was going to be great but then it died almost immediately. Ill try to remember the name... I may still have it.

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      JollyWizard (jollywizard@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 07:37:03 JST JollyWizard JollyWizard
      in reply to
      • Blurry Moon
      @eriner @sun nailed it on the domain.

      biggest problem is where/how to store the comments. Ripe for abuse that could stick you with major hosting costs. Decentralized would be better.

      Dissenter was stored on gab servers, and limited to their userbase.

      User should have control over what sources to include.
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      JollyWizard (jollywizard@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 09:23:54 JST JollyWizard JollyWizard
      in reply to
      • Blurry Moon
      @sun @eriner looked into it more and you are correct. the whole thing has gotten super fucky.

      I knew they had escalated the blocking of local deployments due to sketchy bloatware installs hijacking homepages with extensions etc, and that had affected things like deploying ublocks automically, but I was under the impression that third party web extensions had the right to self host from their own domain, pending a user UI approval for install, which is apparently not the case.

      Super gay.

      However, a prepackaged distribution of chromium or Firefox, similar to how the tor browser is distributed, could be built with some ci automation.

      I know people who have tried the tor browser. People try new browsers. I don't know one person IRL who has used greasemonkey. Technically a solution but it has a ux smell.
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 09:23:54 JST Blurry Moon Blurry Moon
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      @JollyWizard @eriner I am absolutely not going to build a browser
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Dad (noyoushutthefuckupdad@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 09:45:47 JST Dad Dad
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon
      @sun @JollyWizard @eriner ShitBrowser: it runs like shit but dammit, it's both kinds of free
      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink
      Blurry Moon likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Nick (ndz@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 10:25:47 JST Nick Nick
      in reply to
      • JollyWizard
      • Blurry Moon

      @JollyWizard @eriner @sun

      I found it with the help of ChatGPT. Grok failed me.

      It was called "Glue". This was long before Gab's Dissenter.

      When I learned of this, I thought it would change the web as we know it. You could leave a trail of what websites you visitied. Again, I was wrong...

      https://www.wired.com/2009/06/glue-goes-mainstream-with-new-internet-explorer-plugin/

      In conversation about 7 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      Blurry Moon likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.