Energy consumption of conventional cloud based tech vs decentralised models - or crudely, Twitter vs Mastodon - anyone got news, views? See this post https://saturation.social/@clive/109345164021273865@cjcolclough which suggests as i anecdata knew that server farms & relevant cloud code are run with great efficiency - but how much energy does pervasive tracking use that we cld save?
@lilianedwards@cjcolclough Almost of all Mastodon servers are hosted in server farms like amazon web service, and sharing energy supplied to there. Hardware condition are same, then software? Centrized service is better.
for example, my server runs only one account. server is 2GHz 1 core CPU with 2GB RAM, 20GB SSD and 1TB datastore (AWS t2.small type).
100 accounts require 2GHz 2 core CPU with 8GB RAM, 100GB SSD and 2TB datastore.
@lilianedwards@cjcolclough And mastodon requires server communication, not necessary for Twitter. My server's 70% CPU cycle is spent for server communication right now.
@taiyo Every instance paying do their own datastore that is mostly filled with the same readonly files as other instances seems pointless, when it should be possible to just play videos etc from their original source.
@IanStockport You pointed redundancy, engineering hope to rid. But it’s not waste I think. Imagine when my posted movie got huge view on mastodon.social, I should pay thousands dollers for transporting which I don't use. This redundancy is which decentralized network cost in nature. In other words, natural born CDN.
@IanStockport I got it, It's a real redundancy. But after 4.x, server can remove cache media files within setting. Storage size is not big issue for us. And I got idea that long cache sharing is effective with using low latency cloud storage.