Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Tuesday, 06-May-2025 03:35:06 JST lainy

   • disarray
   • nelle,
   @disarray @nellePoint i'd say that's why it's mostly seen as not viable to leave, because what you'd be giving up would be not worth it. people who are vastly less wealthy, educated or able than the average american move all around the globe all the time, but the jobs they are willing to take are not worth it for most americans.
   • Embed this notice
     lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Tuesday, 06-May-2025 03:52:12 JST lainy

     in reply to

     • disarray
     • φ
     • nelle,
     @fiore @disarray @nellePoint not with the ability, but the willingness. i know a couple with a russian wife and ukrainian husband, they left their family and friends behind and sold of all their belongings so they could move somewhere that's not ukraine or russia. they wouldn't have done that if there hadn't been a present danger of him dying at the front.
     
     of course there's plenty of people who would have an extremely hard time leaving no matter what the danger is, but i think that number is less than most people think.
   • Embed this notice
     φ (fiore@brain.worm.pink)'s status on Tuesday, 06-May-2025 03:52:14 JST φ

     in reply to

     • disarray
     • nelle,

     @lain @disarray @nellePoint well this isnt fair tho , the reason is mkstly economic , not being in enough danger doesnt relate at all with one s ability to leave

     if the danger level rises , those ppl would still b unable to dk so