Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Apr-2025 03:56:44 JST Church of Jeff

   #Trump #MAGA #TrumpEconomy #TrumpCrash #TrumpRecession #NoBillionaires #TaxTheRich #EatTheRich

   Not to mention that it would have benefited the country, versus having it disappear into the ether.

   • Embed this notice
     Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Apr-2025 05:17:33 JST Church of Jeff

     in reply to

     • Cameopilot

     @Cameopilot --

     I keep saying how the billionaires are morally bankrupt because out of all the DOGE cuts, not a SINGLE BILLIONAIRE stepped in and took over the 120 million in Federal funding for CHILDHOOD CANCER RESEARCH.

   • Embed this notice
     Cameopilot (cameopilot@toot.community)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Apr-2025 05:17:34 JST Cameopilot

     in reply to

     @jeffowski
     Unfortunately, most of them would probably prefer to lose $500B to the "ether" than to have to pay $20 to help someone other than themselves or their friends.

   • Embed this notice
     Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Apr-2025 05:18:30 JST Church of Jeff

     in reply to

     • Reiner Jung

     @prefec2 -- But these stocks are the leverage the rich need to keep fed...

     It isn't real money, but the ponzi scheme that lets them get away with everything is in jeopardy.

   • Embed this notice
     Reiner Jung (prefec2@norden.social)'s status on Wednesday, 09-Apr-2025 05:18:31 JST Reiner Jung

     in reply to

     @jeffowski they did not lose money. Their stocks became cheaper at the stock exchange. If they didn't sell stock to a price lower than they bought them, they gained value. Why are journalists get this wrong every single time?