GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Wary Jerry (jerry@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:22:06 JST Wary Jerry Wary Jerry

    Wow. Something just happened in the stock market.

    In conversation about 3 months ago from infosec.exchange permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:22:03 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • Kirk Becker
      @cepheuskb @jerry it's called a dead cat bounce 🙂

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_bounce
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        Dead cat bounce
        In finance, a dead cat bounce is a small, brief recovery in the price of a declining asset. Derived from the idea that "even a dead cat will bounce if it falls from a great height", the phrase is also popularly applied to any case where a subject experiences a brief resurgence during or following a severe decline. This may also be known as a "sucker rally". History The earliest citation of the phrase in the news media dates to December 1985 when the Singaporean and Malaysian stock markets bounced back after a hard fall during the recession of that year. Journalists Chris Sherwell and Wong Sulong of the London-based Financial Times were quoted as saying the market rise was "what we call a dead cat bounce". Both the Singaporean and Malaysian economies continued to fall after the quote, although both economies recovered in the following years. The phrase was used again the following year about falling oil prices. In the San Jose Mercury News, Raymond F. DeVoe Jr. proposed that "Beware the Dead Cat Bounce" be printed on bumper stickers and followed up with a graphic explanation. This quote was referenced throughout...
    • Embed this notice
      Kirk Becker (cepheuskb@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:22:06 JST Kirk Becker Kirk Becker
      in reply to

      @jerry Not sure where that sudden increase of nearly 1500 points came from. Looking for the news.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Wary Jerry (jerry@infosec.exchange)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:23:34 JST Wary Jerry Wary Jerry
      in reply to

      I am hearing 90 tariff pause

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Annika Backstrom (annika@xoxo.zone)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:23:34 JST Annika Backstrom Annika Backstrom
      in reply to

      @jerry yahoo finance is reporting that now. gee whiz, i wonder what insider traders were poised to take advantage of this surprise development

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:30:40 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • Michael Santaly
      @wonkothesane @jerry funny part is that nobody else is going to cancel their increased tariffs just because we backed down. Asian markets are already crashing in response as well
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Michael Santaly (wonkothesane@mstdn.social)'s status on Monday, 07-Apr-2025 23:30:42 JST Michael Santaly Michael Santaly
      in reply to

      @jerry 90 day pause?

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Apr-2025 00:32:20 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • Michael Santaly
      • Trebach
      @trebach @jerry @wonkothesane Worse? You mean better. Because the consequences of risk need to have teeth.

      The circuit breaker is a safety net that encourages risky behavior.
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Trebach (trebach@functional.cafe)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Apr-2025 00:32:21 JST Trebach Trebach
      in reply to
      • Michael Santaly
      • feld

      @feld @jerry @wonkothesane It would have worse had circuit breakers not been tripped to pause trading

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Apr-2025 00:40:43 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • Michael Santaly
      • Trebach
      @trebach @jerry @wonkothesane buddy I want to see that number go down at least another 20,000 points to about here where sanity exists
      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://media.friedcheese.us/uploads/55/0a/5e/550a5e49889ff1610a8a6fb5895e0b012310a249d8d9bf3272a21bb878661398.jpeg
    • Embed this notice
      Trebach (trebach@functional.cafe)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Apr-2025 00:40:44 JST Trebach Trebach
      in reply to
      • Michael Santaly
      • feld

      @feld @jerry @wonkothesane I meant the crash would have been more severe were it not for the trading hold. I don't know the psychology behind stock traders

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.