Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   CapitalB (capitalb@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 28-Mar-2025 22:02:44 JST CapitalB

   in reply to

   • :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄

   @bonifartius

   Directions from above. Look at biochemistry professors who go with the flow and then retired have all the same peculiar list of stuff and how it really works.

   • Embed this notice
     :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄 (bonifartius@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 28-Mar-2025 22:02:44 JST :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄

     in reply to

     @CapitalB sure, but what about vanden bossche? or john campbell where you can follow the process of reasoning over years now. both are painted as nutjobs. while people who have no expertise blurb about "trust the science" with "the science" being the one position the leadership selected as correct - without having any clue aside lobbyist money.

     lainy likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄 (bonifartius@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 28-Mar-2025 22:02:45 JST :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄

     why would people suddenly start to say things that were wrong when all their careers they didn't?

     corruption? unlikely, they risked or forfeited their careers, social credit or even their whole existence (debanking etc.)

     psyops? maybe? i'd venture it's hard to psyop people into saying the very opposite of their professional convictions if it carries the hefty social penalty described above. laymen are much an easier target.