Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
@irie
> How can we eliminate Ayn Rand's ideas from the American Right?
I don't think she has much influence. She was kinda propped up as a PR maneuver and her writing is tedious and her philosophy was the negation of the USSR, which is dead.
> but the inherent drive for atomization
I think this is a myth, a bogeyman, something right-wing collectivists call individualists as a smear, but they repeat it as if that kind of person actually exists.
There's a big difference between "zero collective interest" and "no involuntary collective membership". Consider a person that enlists in the military but still opposes the draft. The point of disagreement isn't whether loyalty should exist but who decides.
I keep hearing that if I don't love the huwhite race that I am some kind of "atomized individual", a "rootless cosmopolitan", whatever; I don't think of myself that way: I have friends and family, I have colleagues, I participate in a culture. I signed up for that, though: I never signed up for a race, a nation-state, etc. I'm happy to oppose globalism because I also didn't sign up for a globalist regime that recognizes no limits to its authority.
-
Embed this notice
How can we eliminate Ayn Rand's ideas from the American Right? For that matter, from the European Right too.
>collectivism bad
>worship of individualism
>faith bad
>radical self-interest
>helping others bad
>muh capitalism
I understand this may sound good to some people, but these ideas undermine any attempt to resist Globalism as they essentially promote a form of Liberalism (freedom from, atomization) which is the backbone of Globalism. For Globalism to work, Liberalism has to smash a nation into individuals, liberating them from racial, religious, cultural, even gender collectives.
I know Libertarians are natural allies to every anti-Globalist (anti-Liberal) group, by mere virtue of their dedication to personal freedom and free speech; but the inherent drive for atomization prevents a substantial resistance, which has to be the resistance of a collective; and in the case of opposing Globalism, it even has to be the resistance of ethnic collectives (Multipolarity).