Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 12:57:39 JST feld
   How do these websites work where they somehow take over your browser navigation history so the back button doesn't work besides its filled with duplicates of the current page?
   
   And why isn't this automatically detected and denied by browsers?
   
   Is there a browser extension that fixes this?
   • Embed this notice
     Fish of Rage (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 12:59:11 JST Fish of Rage

     in reply to
     @feld window.location.back() in js
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 12:59:57 JST feld

     in reply to

     • Fish of Rage
     @sun it does this bullshit
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:25:22 JST feld

     in reply to

     • Yuchen Pei
     @quasi At that point I point as well not use the internet at all
   • Embed this notice
     Yuchen Pei (quasi@peister.org)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:25:28 JST Yuchen Pei

     in reply to
     @feld
     Have you tried disabling javascript
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:49:11 JST feld

     in reply to

     • I am Water
     @SlicerDicer If the site is intentionally injecting fake events with the same URL into your navigation history they should just be squashed down to one record
   • Embed this notice
     I am Water (slicerdicer@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:49:12 JST I am Water

     in reply to
     @feld >> And why isn't this automatically detected and denied by browsers?
     
     Wouldn’t this break the internet?
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:54:23 JST feld

     in reply to

     • I am Water
     @SlicerDicer Same page URL not same domain. There's no way a user can do that. Except what, hit page refresh? Those don't get counted anyway. Same idea.
     
     So I propose: If last page matches current page exactly, don't store another record
     
     Can they cheat by faking unique page navigations with "?params=whatever" or "#anchors" in the URL ? Sure. So let's group those together in a way you can skip back to the next previous domain entirely
     Another Linux Walt Alt likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     I am Water (slicerdicer@friedcheese.us)'s status on Thursday, 06-Feb-2025 13:54:24 JST I am Water

     in reply to
     @feld How do you determine what’s fake and what’s real. The enshittification process guarantees abuse happens.
   • Embed this notice
     OpenComputeDesign (opencomputedesign@linuxrocks.online)'s status on Friday, 07-Feb-2025 02:47:25 JST OpenComputeDesign

     in reply to

     @feld This should honestly be considered a federal crime.

     feld likes this.