pros and cons of embedding a social media post in a news story / blog post in a post "twitter turned to liquid shit" era:
+ links to original "full context" post & poster (but so would <a><img></a>)
+ any edits to post are visible, for platforms that support it (but maybe unedited version is the story?)
+ live-updated engagement counts
- you are trusting the platform holder to draw something on *your* webpage
- it is going to become an empty hole in your webpage at some point in the future
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
JP (jplebreton@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 07:01:45 JST JP
-
Embed this notice
jwz (jwz@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 07:01:44 JST jwz
@jplebreton The only correct way to "embed" any social media post is, was, and always will be with the <blockquote> tag. I will die on this hill and I will take every one of you motherfuckers with me.
-
Embed this notice
JP (jplebreton@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 07:01:45 JST JP
personally i think i would probably just screenshot the post, make the <img> a link to the original post, and provide a full transcription in the alt text. twitter created millions of holes in webpages, some of which excised what the entire focus of the news story was and memory-holing vital context. it feels bad to do if you believe (as i do) in the ideal of the web as a good faith cooperative effort where trust matters but we've been shown that trust is worthless to the corporate platforms.
Matthew Lyon repeated this.
-
Embed this notice