GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 22:57:20 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:

    Somehow, yesterday I experienced a new form of email nonsense. Someone claimed they were replying to my emails, and able to send without apparent issue, except... my server logs show nothing.

    I even checked the pcap ring buffer. Nary a SYN from their server IPs.

    Wat!?

    In conversation about 4 months ago from infosec.exchange permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 23:01:24 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to

      Silently discarding email is an awful, awful thing to do.

      Ideally, reject before accepting it, but if you can't do that, at least send a bloody bounce message.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Kevin Bowrin ☕ (kevinbowrin@ottawa.place)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 23:02:20 JST Kevin Bowrin ☕ Kevin Bowrin ☕
      in reply to

      @ryanc 🫡 good luck debugging that one!

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 23:02:20 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Kevin Bowrin ☕

      @kevinbowrin I mean, there's fuckall I can do without convincing a government IT department to send me logs, which, 🤣

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bill (sempf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 23:04:47 JST Bill Bill
      in reply to

      @ryanc That's direct violation of 5321 isn't it?

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:31:32 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill

      @Sempf Yeah. So? Lots of domains bounce postmaster@

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bill (sempf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:32:10 JST Bill Bill
      in reply to

      @ryanc That's a good point.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Royce Williams (tychotithonus@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:02:11 JST Royce Williams Royce Williams
      in reply to
      • Bill

      @Sempf @ryanc
      It's been awhile since I was in the daily email game, but I assume blowback is still a non-trivial problem, such that silent discard, despite non-compliance, might sometimes be preferable to innocent bystanders receiving blowback? But deciding when to do that must be complicated ...

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:02:11 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @Sempf rejection at smtp transaction time does not cause backscatter

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Royce Williams (tychotithonus@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:02:38 JST Royce Williams Royce Williams
      in reply to
      • Bill

      @ryanc @Sempf That works fine when there are only two SMTP servers involved, but what happens when it is multi-hop?

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:03:36 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @Sempf if they can't be bothered to decide whether they're going to accept it at that time 🖕

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:05:17 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @Sempf hold the connection while validating at the next hop

      (this is a bit ideological)

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:06:09 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @Sempf being less extreme, it's pretty safe to send a bounce if SPF and DKIM validate

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Royce Williams (tychotithonus@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:07:29 JST Royce Williams Royce Williams
      in reply to
      • Bill

      @ryanc @Sempf I mean, I get that, but in the meantime the blowback still hits the innocent non-sender. As a troubleshooter, I 100% hated silent discard, but as a spam fighter from back in the day, never doing that produced a whole bunch of busy work and harm that was impossible to work around otherwise. (Rejecting early in the connection was of course ideal!). But I've been out of this game for more than a decade ...

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Royce Williams (tychotithonus@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 02:08:15 JST Royce Williams Royce Williams
      in reply to
      • Bill

      @ryanc @Sempf Yeah, that's definitely an angle that wasn't as available to me back then. If past me it was working this, I would 100% be looking for a milter that did that!

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 03:33:57 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @Sempf the cursed thing here is that the sending side is silently discarding it

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 03:34:33 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @Sempf @tychotithonus do you need a hug?

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bill (sempf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 03:34:34 JST Bill Bill
      in reply to
      • Royce Williams

      @tychotithonus @ryanc I have learned more about SMTP in this conversation then I have in 25 years of fucking with it.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bill (sempf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 05:01:58 JST Bill Bill
      in reply to
      • Royce Williams

      @ryanc @tychotithonus No, just a brain.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: (ryanc@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 05:47:27 JST Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag: Ryan Castellucci :nonbinary_flag:
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Erik Ableson
      • Royce Williams

      @erik @Sempf @tychotithonus I've forgotten more about HTTP than most people will ever know...

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Erik Ableson (erik@mastodon.infrageeks.social)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 05:47:30 JST Erik Ableson Erik Ableson
      in reply to
      • Bill
      • Royce Williams

      @Sempf @tychotithonus @ryanc is that what happens when you hit the age of the port number? Remind me to die before I hit 80 years old...

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bill (sempf@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 06:24:59 JST Bill Bill
      in reply to
      • Erik Ableson
      • Royce Williams

      @ryanc @erik @tychotithonus I was gonna say, I spend most of my time at 443 so I'm probably ok there.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.