GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:03:35 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross

    Random Q: does anyone know how much a fully fuelled New Glenn stack (without payload) weighs on the launchpad? Nothing in Wikipedia, nothing in Encyclopedia Astronautica, nothing on Blue Origin's website …

    I'm guessing about 1700 tonnes (going by lift-off t:w ratio of about 1.1 and 2450kN thrust per BE-4 engine) but I've got a nerdish wish to be accurate.

    In conversation about 5 months ago from wandering.shop permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 00:18:02 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to

      Anyway, if 1400 tonnes is in the right ball-park for New Glenn, then it's half the mass of a Saturn V and almost a quarter the mass of Starship v2.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 01:08:13 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • Administrator

      @mdm How many times has the BE-2 engine flown? I make it 4 on Vulkan and now 7 on New Glenn. So they're barely into double-digits of flight-rated motors. I suspect that, like Merlin and Raptor, the BE-2 will be tweaked to produce more thrust in due course.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Administrator (mdm@mcnamarii.town)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 01:08:14 JST Administrator Administrator
      in reply to

      @cstross ...based on how slowly it lifted off, they've either got to drop that mass (carry less fuel?) or add another engine (probably not possible).

      But a very impressive launch, nonetheless!

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 01:08:33 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • crater🐮n

      @cratermoon Doesn't look that way.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      crater🐮n (cratermoon@zirk.us)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 01:08:35 JST crater🐮n crater🐮n
      in reply to

      @cstross Side note: has Encyclopedia Astronautica been updated since about 2018-2019?

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 03:40:41 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • Administrator

      @mdm Bezos has already shaken up the launch industry: ULA's Vulkan rides on a pair of BE-4s, has comparable payload to Falcon 9,, and ULA will have to bite the bullet and go for reusability or be roadkill.

      (I half-expect Blue Origin to buy ULA and position these rockets as a family of medium and heavy weight lifters with significant parts commonality.)

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Administrator (mdm@mcnamarii.town)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 03:40:43 JST Administrator Administrator
      in reply to

      @cstross (BE-4, right?)

      I was looking up some quick stats, and it seems like each BE-4 engine is very close to SpaceX's raptor (around 500k freedom units of force). I don't know how much more power they can get out of a BE-4.

      That being said, SpaceX is cramming 33 similar engines into one booster. I have no idea how -- I guess the 2 meters more diameter makes a difference.

      I never thought I'd say this, but I am really rooting for Bezos here, to increase some competition.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:12:07 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • Matt Nelsen

      @zmatt You saw the lift-off video: it went up *really* slowly as it left the pad, maybe 0.1g acceleration at first. So I went for thrust:weight of 1.1, and we know how much thrust the BE-4 produces at full throttle. Hence my estimate.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Nelsen (zmatt@beige.party)'s status on Friday, 17-Jan-2025 04:12:08 JST Matt Nelsen Matt Nelsen
      in reply to

      @cstross I like your number:

      I measured a cutaway diagram from https://thespacebucket.com/a-closer-look-at-new-glenn-its-progress/ to get a rough estimate of the length of the tanks, got a volume for a 7 meter cylinder and multiplied by density (assuming the minimum density for LNG) and get 1,600 metric tons. Add in miscellaneous (cargo, engines) and I think you're there.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://media.beige.party/media_attachments/files/113/839/560/788/604/324/original/556e6105fe2f9cf9.png

      2. https://media.beige.party/media_attachments/files/113/839/578/662/431/646/original/587cb3246034af2e.jpg
      3. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: thespacebucket.com
        A Closer Look At New Glenn & Its Progress
        from Vince

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.