GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    altruios phasma (altruios@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 08:10:25 JST altruios phasma altruios phasma
    • Rich Felker
    • tante

    @woe2you @dalias @tante in addition, LLM’s can pretend to be old people to waste time of scammers… that’s another solid use case.

    In conversation about 6 months ago from mastodon.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 08:10:25 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • tante

      @altruios @woe2you @tante This ignores the asymmetry, that attackers (scammers) get far more advantage from LLMs than defenders (honeypots).

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:05:13 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • tante

      @altruios @woe2you @tante Without LLMs, attacker has 100:1 advantage. With LLMs, 1000000000:1.

      (Made up numbers but the concept holds. Honeytraps are not all that useful especially if the attacker has near unlimited parallelism.)

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      altruios phasma (altruios@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:05:14 JST altruios phasma altruios phasma
      in reply to
      • Rich Felker
      • tante

      @dalias @woe2you @tante I seem ignorant here on what disadvantage there would be.
      wouldn’t an LLM be a potentially more effective (scalable too) honeytrap than current honeytraps? I know an attacker has an advantage in the general case: so why not supe up the honeypots?

      Using an LLM cost next to pennies. Training it is where the energy use happens). This seems like a really good idea to use them as honeypots for scammers…

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      altruios phasma (altruios@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:21:20 JST altruios phasma altruios phasma
      in reply to
      • Rich Felker
      • tante

      @dalias @woe2you @tante how do LLM honeytraps increase the attackers effectiveness as you claim? That makes zero sense: so if you could explain clearly…

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 16-Jan-2025 09:21:20 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • tante

      @altruios @woe2you @tante They don't. Rather, the existence of LLMs massively amplifies the attacker's power, but only helps the defender build more honeytraps. If you were, outside capitalist motives to scam investors & public, deciding whether to invest astronomical amounts of resources into creating LLMs to aid defenders, a rational decision process would quickly rule that out because they'd amplify attacker power far more.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.