she hacked you
I have a proposal for a solution of the term "AI"; it is neither intelligent by any definition, and often has humans cultivating data sets
And even artist talking about it are forced to talk bout it in the terms as it if is "AI" which benefits them anytime you even engage in discussion
I think a far more accurate and useful description is:
Slop Algorithm
It is a series of machine learning algorithms not AI, and generates slop, not intelligence
de nada
Kevin Dominik Korte
@ekis The philosophical discussion behind the term AI is rather fascinating. Until ChatGPT released their toy to the public, AI was explicitly defined as not a simulation of Human Intelligence.
Maybe AI should be an explicit warning not to let marketing departments and Wall Street bankers take over scientific terms.
she hacked you
@kdkorte How do we wrestle the words back from the marketers? They have a lot more soft power than us scientists
she hacked you
@uriel I don't wear a shirt that says dictionary on it
How about you define what you think it is, but I will likely laugh at you
Uriel Fanelli
@ekis@mastodon.social define "intelligence", pls.
she hacked you
I'm not going to entertain the idea that we did not move the goalposts on what AI is.
In addition, the backtracking to AGI is just as stupid because it fails to understand the concept general intelligence too
The conversation begins with everyone agreeing this is marketing hype
There are interesting applications of all types of machine learning-- but pretending we can create artificial intelligence when we can't understand the animal brain is hubris beyond belief
she hacked you
But all big tech will need to do is market the concept enough, so that people accept it as what AI always meant
Then they can control what it spits out and control what is "intelligent"; right now what these models spit out is often racist
Who would have known putting in all books into a model would make it racist? I guess anyone who reads, but besides them, who?
Rich Felker
@uriel @ekis You can search my posts for some attempts, like https://hachyderm.io/@dalias/112980714725349113
she hacked you
I have used tools like these for a long time, there have been advancements.
But suggesting these advances have made software capable of creative thought and intent is absurd.
I doubt anything remotely resembling AI would require computation ability beyond what we have, not just GPUs; but like quantum computers that don't fall apart when they scale
she hacked you
Its not just the GPU infrastructure from cryptocurrency, its also the false promises, and things that are always on the horizon if you keep dumping money into it
Rich Felker
@uriel @ekis You are contributing nothing meaningful to this thread. Fuck off.
Uriel Fanelli
@dalias@hachyderm.io @ekis@mastodon.social
1) This is not a definition.
2) That "definition" means nothing meaningful.
georgebmillion.com
@ekis excellent take, the next big thing in processing power... or its achievement.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.