GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈 (danwentzel@urbanists.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 08:36:20 JST Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈 Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈

    My whole life I have seen advertisements for desk jobs that required people to have driver's licenses, use of a vehicle, and insurance, even when there was no driving involved in the job at all.

    Requiring a driver's license for employment is now prohibited in California if driving is not reasonably expected to be part of the job duties. This is a huge victory for people who use transit and cycling for their mobility.
    https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/12/28/new-in-2025-protecting-more-workers/

    In conversation about 5 months ago from urbanists.social permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.gov.ca.gov
      New in 2025: Protecting more workers
      from marissasaldivar
      State of California
    • feld likes this.
    • Marcos M. 🚲 and Rich Felker repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Marcos M. 🚲 (euklidiadas@masto.es)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 18:58:34 JST Marcos M. 🚲 Marcos M. 🚲
      in reply to
      • Gonzalo

      @Gonzalo

      Desconocía completamente la estupidez previa y la victoria actual. xD

      Mil gracias.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Gonzalo (gonzalo@paquita.masto.host)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 18:58:35 JST Gonzalo Gonzalo
      in reply to
      • Marcos M. 🚲

      @euklidiadas Quizá te interese. Hasta ahora era obligatorio pedir carné de conducir a quienes solicitaban un puesto público en el estado de California, aunque el trabajo no implicara manejar vehículos. Acaban de revocar ese requisito, como una victoria de quienes usan el transporte público y la bicicleta.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      SpaceLifeForm (spacelifeform@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 21:14:44 JST SpaceLifeForm SpaceLifeForm
      in reply to

      @danwentzel

      A barrier to entry.

      They want to know if you can afford a car to underpay you.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
      Rich Felker repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Viral Obscurity (viralobscurity@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 21:14:44 JST Viral Obscurity Viral Obscurity
      in reply to
      • SpaceLifeForm

      @SpaceLifeForm @danwentzel I was once told at a job interview (in the UK) that the company requires all employees to own a vehicle because it means that they can reliably attend work

      This was an interview for an office job 10-15 mins walk from where I lived at the time

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Nicole Parsons (npars01@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 21:18:05 JST Nicole Parsons Nicole Parsons
      in reply to

      @danwentzel

      Driver's licenses served other purposes.

      It's used to check credit scores, find driving infractions, engage in wage theft, or misuse residency to underpay -- all things that rarely had anything to do with job responsibilities.

      It's used to sift out candidates. Fewer wheelchair users have a drivers license. Ditto the working poor, disabled, or unhoused.

      Employers avoid hiring candidates who might ask for WFH or get stuck in traffic frequently.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Nicole Parsons (npars01@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 21:19:38 JST Nicole Parsons Nicole Parsons
      in reply to

      @danwentzel

      The requirement for a car was used to subsidize company operations.

      "Can you pick up the cake for Joe's retirement during lunch?"

      "Please pick up the mail on your way into work & get me a pack of cigarettes too."

      "Drop off the samples at the printers on your way home"

      It's coercive & a cost/mile reimbursement never covers the full cost of owning a vehicle.

      It offloads corporate expenses onto employees & it's used for unpaid overtime running errands.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈 (danwentzel@urbanists.social)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 21:19:39 JST Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈 Dan Wentzel 🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to
      • Nicole Parsons

      @Npars01 I do not own a car by choice but maintain a driver's license. The insistence that someone needed to have their own car before applying for a stationary job never made sense nor seemed fair.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
      Rich Felker repeated this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.