@Radical_EgoCom@anarchistquotes If I heard "dictatorship of the proletariat" I would think "Trots squabbling amongst themselves, BAU for them, none of my business" and I would get on with something else having felt no need at all to educate myself about the various factions of lefties.
@Radical_EgoCom@anarchistquotes In which case *everybody* "chooses ignorance" about *most* things. Which is a somewhat obvious, and therefore not interesting, observation.
It's more the fact that you're aware of your ignorance of Marxism, have been made aware (by me right now) that your perception of Marxism is incorrect, and are seemingly okay with it, which is different from someone just being ignorant of something.
The fact that you think that the arguments that Marxist have with each other are equivalent to a bunch of people arguing over the names of their groups is proof that you do have a perception of Marxism and that it's blatantly wrong. I don't think you could've shown your ignorance of Marxism any more than trying to compare this video to Marxist infighting, which you very clearly know nothing about.
That's why I blocked Tim. I would've been fine with them arguing against Marxism and having a genuine debate, but they don't even care about what Marxism is actually about, only criticizing it from their position of ignorance.
@FranceskaMann@anarchistquotes@Radical_EgoCom I have plenty of other things higher up my list of things to think about. *Nobody* can think about *everything*, there's just too much "everything". And the world wouldn't work as well if we all thought about the same things and we all ignored the same other things.
That's not the way I see it. From what I've read of the Soviet Union and Cuba, to use just two examples, the state was truly a class dictatorship of the proletariat.
you know what?, "dictatorship of the proletariat" has rubbed me the wrong way for quite a long time
until I took the thought that democracy is the dictatorship of the majority, and that the proletariat are the ultimate majority, which makes dictatorship of the proletariat ultimate democracy
The period of state capitalism, the NEP (New Economic Policy), only lasted from 1921 to 1928 and only existed to rebuild the Russian economy after the Civil War. After that, Stalin initiated the first of three five-year plans and the transition into socialism. The bureaucratic elite within the Soviet Union also can not be equivocated with a traditional oligarchy, which is a small group of individuals controlling the state, which wasn't the exact case in the Soviet Union.
@Radical_EgoCom@anarchistquotes NO desde el ascenso de Stalin en adelante La definición, marxista😉 , del regimen de la URSS corresponde a capitalismo de estado y eso explica la facilidad con que se convirtió en una oligarquía tradicional😩
The Soviet Union had a planned economy, nationalized the means of production, and made extensive efforts to abolish capitalist class structures. It was not a perfect socialist system and experienced many deviations, but it was unequivocally a socialist state committed to socialist goals, and I am viewing this from a Marxist point of view.