GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:13 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

    Governance in FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) is not some unsolvable mystery, BTW. My late friend Pieter Hintjens actually wrote a book on how to get it right. It centers on the C4 (Community Code Construction Contract) approach that removes ego from the process, if implemented right, and welcomes new contributors (even if just fly-by) through optimistic merging. ZeroMQ is quite happy and thriving with that approach. Chapter 4 of Social Architecture https://hintjens.gitbooks.io/social-architecture/content/chapter4.html 1/5

    In conversation about 5 months ago from social.wildeboer.net permalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Chapter 4 - The ZeroMQ Process: C4 · Social Architecture
      from Pieter Hintjens
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:07 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      I have now created https://c4process.wildeboer.net to share and open the discussion on the #C4process. Links to the repositories are in the footer of that page.

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        https://c4process.wildeboer.net/
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:09 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      Lessons I have learned over the years (and I wish my younger self would have known earlier):

      - Ideas are bigger than people
      - Set your ideas free to find new friends by keeping your ego out and the ideas become projects and reality
      - People fail. All of them. No one is perfect. Doesn't make their best ideas A Bad Thing
      - Take ideas and concepts as input. Not as personal attack or a reason to focus on whatever else a person might have done wrong

      And finally: be patient. It's a superpower. 5/5

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:10 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      (To anyone that will try to smear Pieter for some of the controversies he has caused I say: He died. He was not a perfect person. No one is. People fail. But his books do share a lot of food for thought. Work with his ideas and concepts by criticising them based on facts. That is totally fine with me. But decouple his ideas and concepts from your personal dislike of him as a person and discuss the ideas and concepts on the merits instead of simply dismissing them, deal?) 4/5

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
      Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br) likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:11 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      - You CAN have rules to simply kick them out. No need to go into their preferred mode of pigeon chess [1] or bike shedding [2].
      - You MUST have these rules and be prepared to enforce them.

      Read his book. I have been saying this for many years. It's never too late to start. 3/5

      [1] https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Pigeon%20chess
      [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        Law of triviality
        The law of triviality is C. Northcote Parkinson's 1957 argument that people within an organization commonly give disproportionate weight to trivial issues. Parkinson provides the example of a fictional committee whose job was to approve the plans for a nuclear power plant spending the majority of its time on discussions about relatively minor but easy-to-grasp issues, such as what materials to use for the staff bicycle shed, while neglecting the proposed design of the plant itself, which is far more important and a far more difficult and complex task. The law has been applied to software development and other activities. The terms bicycle-shed effect, bike-shed effect, and bike-shedding were coined based on Parkinson's example; it was popularized in the Berkeley Software Distribution community by the Danish software developer Poul-Henning Kamp in 1999 and, due to that, has since become popular within the field of software development generally. Argument The concept was first presented as a corollary of his broader "Parkinson's law" spoof of management. He dramatizes this...

    • Embed this notice
      Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: (jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net)'s status on Wednesday, 25-Dec-2024 22:02:12 JST Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
      in reply to

      Some lessons he has learned over the years:

      - Successful FOSS projects WILL attract ego driven men (always men) that try to become the project leader.
      - FOSS developers WILL initially welcome these types as they seem to solve all problems wrt public presentation and other social things the developers struggle with.
      - You CAN recognise the evil traits of these folks early

      2/5

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br) (lxo@gnusocial.jp)'s status on Thursday, 26-Dec-2024 16:36:40 JST Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br) Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br)
      in reply to
      • stallmansupport
      He was not a perfect person. No one is. People fail. But his books do share a lot of food for thought. Work with his ideas and concepts by criticising them based on facts. That is totally fine with me. But decouple his ideas and concepts from your personal dislike of him as a person and discuss the ideas and concepts on the merits instead of simply dismissing them, deal?

      good words to live by, whatever the referent cc: @stallmansupport
      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
      Eric Ireland likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      stallmansupport (stallmansupport@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 30-Dec-2024 10:12:28 JST stallmansupport stallmansupport
      in reply to
      • Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br)

      @lxo @jwildeboer

      Not aware of Hintjens' "controversies" but reading his writings now out of curiosity; some quite interesting indeed, thanks.

      Search revelead the GNU website lists his FFII https://www.gnu.org/links/links.html

      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
        Links to Other Free Software Sites - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation
        from mailto:webmasters@gnu.org

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.